Although gold closed
up for the third straight day, the run down in gold stocks continued today
to 1 up and ELEVEN down, tying the longest such run ever ( for 1 up then
down runs; the longest run down ever is 13 ) . However, this run down continues
to be extremely weak ( averaging well less than 1% per day down ) and is
very unlikely to mark a meaningful low. Resistance continues to be about
1-3% higher, at the 35-39 day back prices. A move over those 35-39 day
back prices would be a buy. That window of opportunity closes a little
every day, having about another week to do it before the 35-39 back prices
start rising to a point where the 16-20 back prices will be lower than
the 35-39 day prices. It doesn't look good at all for the bulls but we
have to get an up day soon! Interesting how posters ( Ror ) had pointed
out the earlier 10 or 11 day down run in Dec gold which now has been followed
by a similarly long run down in gold stocks even after 3 up days in gold.
I don't know what the meaning ( if any ) of that is. USERX remains at a
new all-time low ( .258 today as compared to the all-time high of over
10.00, a drop of about 97.5% in a mutual fund and still going down ) .
And "the books" preach a buy-and-hold stock strategy as being optimal.
Just wait till the tech funds decline 97.5%!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
I remember earlier
this year, in March, when gold itself had gone down for 6 straight days
in a fairly large way and I went long only to be stopped out the next day
with a loss on an extraordinarily unlikely 7th day down that hit the index
stop and turned me completely bearish. Yesterday everything suggested buying
and then today the run down continued to 1 up and 7 down. Once in history
it's gone to 8 down and once to 11 down. And now the end of this run won't
necessarily be a meaningful bottom. It begs repeating the idea that trading
against the long-term down trend in gold stocks is a dangerous enterprise
and is why I did not buy yesterday and am hesitant to buy until I really
get a signal or run that indicates a powerful move up, even if the long-term
trend in gold stocks hasn't turned up yet. I know that I feel like gold
bug hell. I know, I know, it's a chance to buy cheaper for a larger eventual
gain. In terms of capitulation, the run down is long, but it's only averaging
1% a day and therefore does not qualify as a capitulation run in my book.
And notice how cash gold went up today breaking that run down, opening
it up to possible further downside.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The run will reach
1 up and 6 down today. The odds of gold stocks declining again tomorrow
is only about 3% ( 97% prob of an up day tomorrow ) . USERX will hit a
fibonacci # today and be sitting right on top of declining 35-39 day back
prices, even if the stocks sell off more in the rest of the day. Falling
below those back prices is the stop. The upside potential of this trade,
however, is extremely limited over the next week since a rise of only 1-2%
will cause prices to rise back above the 16-20 day index, generating a
sell. After another week of just sitting here, however, the rise could
be larger. Therefore, I am personally going to remain a chicken and wait
at least until the end of this week to see if after 1 or 2 tiny projected
up days coming up, we hold for the rest of the week. But you can buy at
the close today with a potential loss in only the 2% area and a potential
gain in the 6% area over the next 2-3 weeks. No major risk and no major
reward on this technical analysis.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Yes, 97% of the time
when 1 up 6 down occurs simultaneously with a 16-20 buy signal ( prices
falling below the 16-20 back prices ) . A little scarey here because the
prices are barely above the 35-39 day back prices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
1993 buy signal was
a classic primary bull signal, but lacked a capitulation bottom ( so in
retrospect I learned? that a bull buy without a classic capitulation is
perhaps a fairly poor bull, only a double ) . Prices crossed above the
16-20 on 1/19/93, then above the 35-39 on 2/5/93, then above the 92-96
on 3/11/93, all of which was NOT a bull market buy. The bull requires a
92-96 index buy on "the path". "The path" is determined by which index
gives the first/next buy. The above pattern had the 35-39 buy on the path
( not a bull ) . But then the 92-96 gave a sell on 3/9/93 after its buy,
ending the 35-39 index buy signal and opening up the path to any index
signal that gave the next buy. The 92-96 index gave the next buy executed
on 3/15/93. A bull is indicated by a 92-96 on the path and not XXed out.
The common pattern is a 35-39 buy followed by a 92-96 buy ( a high ) ,
followed by a 92-96 sell ( a low ) , followed immediately ( i.e., with
no 35-39 signal ) by the 92-96 buy signal calling for a bull market. This
pattern has been wrong once in history ( I called for bull and was stopped
out ) . Generally, the rule is that the path is determined by whichever
index gives the earliest buy signal with tied signals going to the longer
index. The buy ends on the index sell signal that gave the buy on the path
OR if a higher level index gives a sell. It is almost always true that
a shorter term index ( 35-39 ) will give the first buy signal before the
92-96 ( visualize a rise after a decline ) . Right now we have crossed
over the 16-20, crossed over the 35-39 and almost crossed over the 92-96
( last week's 9/8 high ) . Had we crossed over the 92-96 last week then
fallen and then risen, a primary bull would have been predicted. We're
still on the 35-39 day index buy path and must cross above the 92-96, fall
below the 92-96, then rise above it for a bull. Would need userx to hold
next week, then rise above 2.80, then fall and quickly rise again, requiring
at least a month in time. Very unlikely. Index gave the massive long-term
bear signal in late 1998, predicting an 80% decline in gold shares from
their highs ( 1998 and 1999 ) . We are currently down only 40% from those
highs, halfway there. Please ask about the above, because I know it all
and can't tell what other people won't understand as I try to explain it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Hope you see this
response tomorrow. I have analyzed the runs on both cash/spot COMEX and
the active month ( which keeps changing ) since they started trading. I
cannot say which is a truer indicator of the price of gold, so I do not
disagree with you there. I can say that the run pattern of cash COMEX gold
IS more predictive of future price behavior than the futures contract.
In particular, lengthy down runs in futures gold are more common than in
cash gold. This is largely due to the interest charges inherent in the
futures prices and becomes more significant during periods of higher interest
rates ( Hence, when gold is flat I want to be short, thereby capturing
a nice interest charge profit ) . During up runs, the opposite is true:
lengthy up runs are more common in cash gold than in the futures. This
occurs primarily due to days when the futures are unchanged or down a t
dime or two. Since the futures price contains an interest rate factor of
about 5 cents a day ( used to be much more than that ) , futures down runs
are more likely and up runs are less likely. Statistically, the futures
runs are empirically less predictive. When cash gold goes down 5 or 6 days
in row, that's an unusual run. However, the predictive ability of the number
of days down must also be tempered by the size ( percentage wise ) of the
total down move. The major, major bottoms are marked by many days down
plus a high percentage loss per day. We are now down 5 or 6 days in a row
in cash ( I think ) , but the percentage move down is very small, predicting
that this is likely to a low ( or close to it ) but that the subsequent
rise will also be very weak. Twelve days down in futures gold has happened
many times in history. It has never happened in cash gold. The longest
is 8 in cash gold and once at seven ( this year ) . Finally, be careful
about cash gold as "they" often change the price a dime or two after the
close to miraculously alter the run analysis at a critical juncture ( wait
at least a half hour after the close to get the closing figure -- it's
unbelievable at times how "they" change the number from down or unchanged
to up thereby "destroying" the run ) . Cheers--You are investigating an
important trading/predictive tool which works even better on USERX runs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Just did today's numbers
after I saw the big drop today. Prices fell today below the 16-20 index
generating the signal, a trading buy for Monday. Unfortunately, the userx
price also hit EXACTLY ( not surprisingly ) the high 35-39 day index price,
starting the 35-39 index towards a sell ( a sell being very bad ) . Traders
are supposed to buy on Monday with a stop at the 35-39 day index sell (
down about 3% from here ) . We have gotten the run analysis little buy
coupled with the index buy. We are at support. No bull market, no great
rise, but a 85% probability of a 4% rise up in userx with a possible 3-4%
loss on the trade ( but with the probs strongly favoring the up move )
. If you're long ( and you should NOT be long ) , hold the longs here.
"Interesting" how the index, the TA, fits the BOE auction again on Tuesday.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Hadn't seen the xau
falling so much today. Should have looked before posting. The up gap has
now been filled? Makes it much more likely that we'll get that 16-20 index
signal by Wed next week. A little up on Monday, then down into the trading
buy, but basically all is still bearish except for the nimble traders on
that buy signal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
On Wed 9/6 I posted
that userx had hit the 92-96 day index and that that was MAJOR resistance.
A 92-96 XXed out buy signal ( crossing over the back prices ) was a definitive
sell. Conclusion was "sideways to down" from there. That was correct, but
not really profitable due to the low volatility.
On each day after that the 92-96 index
broke closer and closer to the XXed out buy, even as prices slightly declined,
with the index moving from -100 ( max ) on 9/5 to a -6 on 9/12. Remember
a cross over zero into positive numbers would generate a signal. USERX's
very slight drops since then have definitively avoided the signal.
On 9/13 the run pattern on userx went
to 1 day up and 3 days down. You should know by now that that is definitively
bearish, negating the bullish run pattern reported on 8/31. We are now
1 up and 5 down as of today's close. THE END OF THIS RUN DOWN WILL BE A
BUY IF IF IT OCCURS TOGETHER WITH AN INDEX BUY SIGNAL. The buy signal would
be a fall below the 16-20 back prices ( a 16-20 index trading buy ) . The
16-20 index is now breaking towards that buy and probably will give it
in 2 or 3 more days. Even if the run down stops, the next 16-20 day index
signal is likely to yield a very short-term trading bottom with a return
to the top of the trading range. Rule: If the 35-39 is on a buy ( prices
above the 35-39 back prices ) , the subsequent 16-20 day trading buy on
falling prices is usually good if the 35-39 index is still on a buy. Note
that the 35-39 day back prices are falling fast towards the 8/3 low, so
as long as we stay above those back prices, a trading buy is likely. If
that is correct, the subsequent rise would yield a definitive shorting
signal.
This is all still very long-term bearish
for dollar denominated gold stocks.
My reading on Kitco revealed questions
re: an apparent long run down in gold itself, something like 10 days and
an unchanged day on Dec COMEX gold ( unchanged days do continue runs )
. But remember, NEVER follow runs on futures contracts. ALL RUN ANALYSES
ON GOLD ARE BASED ON SPOT COMEX GOLD ( Not BART's quotes ) . Why? Because
the futures' prices are affected by interest rates, contago's, etc. The
unchanged Dec COMEX day was an up day on spot, breaking the run, stopping
it at 4 or 5, then resuming another 4 or 5 or 6 day run. I didn't check
today, but if it was down again on spot gold today, expect a very small
up on Monday to once again break the down runs which have only gone past
6 days twice in 26 years.
Will post daily as usual as we approach
a possible small trading buy signal next week, possibly coinciding with
filling the gap on the xau.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
I had last posted
that the run up last week should not be a high and that after 1 or 2 down
days, a higher move should occur very short term. That has happened as
of today after a small 1 day down yesterday.
Now is the time to be wary if you are long.
The index is executing the 35-39 day signal tomorrow ( Thursday ) and the
92-96 day index broke today. This is all major resistance. Since the 35-39
day buy signal tomorrow is not XXed out, I cannot definitively say that
short positions are in order tomorrow. The 92-96 day signal, if it occurs,
IS XXed out. It will take another 3 days at a minimum for that signal to
be executed. Alternatively, the market could explode up very soon with
a major major top then definitively occurring about 21 trading days after
tomorrow. The major resistance that we are in right now, coupled with the
continuing low volatility in gold shares suggests that a sideways to down
trend will commence within the next 1 to 2 days. If tommorrow is up and
Friday is down in gold stocks, I strongly advise exiting longs since a
1 down 2 up pattern would then have been completed and would fit with a
sideways to down gold stock trend. But that is getting ahead of the game
for now. I continue to state emphatically that this is not yet a bull market
in gold stocks. Looks like a small upward correction of the previous breakdown
in prices. As always, wish I could be really bullish, but at least the
run analysis has been a little bullish recently.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Since I left for the
hospital last Tuesday the gold stocks have gotten more interesting and
are approaching an important psychological point plus the three day weekend.
You can read on for details and learning, but I WON'T end with some earthshaking
conclusion/prediction.
Prices obviously did climb from that previous
5 down run, which on Tuesday night faked me out with a slightly lower price,
but did mark a little low. The current run turned bullish on Thursday at
1 down 3 up, and continued up on Friday for a current 1 down 4 up. This
run, whenever it ends, usually ( 75% ) does not mark a high beyond 1 or
2 days. The runs are actually somewhat bullish for the first time since
late january.
The indices are breaking towards new signals.
USERX current price is 2.83 tying the prior high on 8/16 after making a
higher low. This is the first higher low this year! The 35-39 index was
a +3 on Friday on userx, a -2 on Thursday, and -5 before then. A small
rise on Monday will generate a signal for Tuesday ( the signal is called
a buy signal because prices are rising over the prior 35-39 day prices,
but this often marks bear market HIGHS . But look at the USERX 92-96 index
back prices as of Friday: 2.90, 2.86, 2.87, 2.85, and 2.85. And they are
dropping every day, tomorrow a 2.84 comes in, just one penny over Friday's
close. A big Psychological point is here or here soon. Will we get a 35-39
day "buy" signal? Probably. Will we get a 92-96 day signal? We'll see.
The 92-96 index here is major resistance. Rising above the 92-96, then
falling below it, and then rising above it gives a true long-term bull
market buy signal. If we rise over it this week, the subsequent fall below
it will be easy since the back prices will quickly fly up to the 3.13 area
( the early May spike up ) . Very important psychological market action
about to happen, which does not REQUIRE any kind of really big price moves.
I'm still a watcher, waiting for the high probability situation that is
( always is ) getting closer. This should no longer be boring if you are
a student of the gold market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Today's 1.2% drop
in gold stocks keeps alive the possibility for a significant buy signal
on Friday if the gold stocks will fall tomorrow and keep falling another
8-9% by Friday. The index needs at least another 1.2% drop TOMORROW to
keep the buy signal scenario alive for Friday. I don't like it when the
gold stocks fall more than gold, as happened today. The 5 down run that
ended last Wed was apparently only a low that lasted for 2 days, not really
any kind of low, but if you recall that run only had a 65% probability
of marking a low anyway. I'm still out of this market and waiting...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Today's small up move
ended the down run at that fairly common 5 up, 5 down sequence yielding
the 65% probability that yesterday was a shortterm low. That's not a real
high prob to me, 65%, but it's the most likely statment. The gold stocks
still have a few more days where a 5% or more 4 day drop would give a very
desirable buy signal. The only bearish scenerio is if we just stay flat
and drift a little lower over the next 2 or more weeks. So nothing looks
exciting to me except for the continuing hope of a quick drop in gold stock
prices, but time is running out on that possibility.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
This is a very interesting
time to be following the runs and the 16-20 day index. Today the back 16-20
prices on userx were 2.73, 2.68, 2.69, 2.64, and 2.66. Closing price was
2.74. Note how the fifth day down in a row came within a penny of the back
prices ( that is support, since a break below those prices within the next
five days is a buy signal ) . Note how tomorrow the high price of 2.73
falls out and the new high price will be 2.70. The runs have not had the
needed up day yet, but most of these runs stop by day 5 ( today ) . The
trend is clearly down until the first up day. I don't know if it will drift
down again tomorrow without hitting the 2.70 price, or if it will turn
up to be a little bottom, or if it will plunge to give a clear buy. Only
5 more days for it to fall below the 16-20 prices for a clear buy. Remember,
if it falls below those prices, it will still take 3 days to give an index
buy signal. Can the down run continue for 3 or 4 more days? Usually, the
rule is that the market takes everything to the max, meaning that tomorrow
we'll get another little down day leaving the situation uncertain for as
long as is psychologically possible, based on the index.
Sorry for the late post, got home a little
while ago from taking my eldest son to college. A tearful event; he was
conceived this day, it was my 24th wedding anniversary, and was the day
he leaves us.
I note with interest APH being long the
Swissie, short silver ( great call ) , and 50% long the gold stocks. Can't
all be right, can it? Barrick bullish right near now ( I note them because
of my respect for their expertise ) . A critical technical/psychological
time so that I can see how a quick break down in gold/gold stocks within
the next 5 days should generate the mechanical index buy, making many (
like I. Auger ) , stopped out or bearish. Will it happen? I really don't
know, but we know what to do if the break down occurs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Today was the expected
day three down on the run from last week's 2 down 5 up Wednesday top. The
three down in this formation confirms that prior run as a high. As posted
last Friday, a day up tomorrow would be bearish because 5 up and 3 down
runs herald a continuing down move at 94% prob. However, a down day tomorrow
would move the run to 5 up and 4 down. At four down or more, that is a
bottom 65% of the time. So if the run continues down tomorrow, the first
day up after that can signal a low. One should cover shorts at that time
to be safe. We could still get the continuing down move to a great index
buy signal if we plunge or at least go to new lows within the next 7 trading
days ... and counting. For example, the current run down could simply continue
for many days, but usually does stop by day 5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Since I'm home after
surgery I can watch the market here and post during the day. P0sted under
"SKI ( beware ) " this AM, warning of a likely key reversal down day in
the gold stocks ( looking at the XAU ) and the stocks sold off on cue at
the very end to form the anticipated key reversal down. As I've posted
several times, although the textbooks say this is very bearish, it usually
( 80% ) is NOT bearish. But if it is bearish it truly leads to lots of
selling. So we had the bearish run of 1 Down 2Up on 8/2 that so far has
been wrong ( prices have risen since then ) . The only way for that run
to be right is for lower prices now. We just finished a 2 down 5 up run
that usually marks a top. The 16-20 index signal was executed today which
is supposed to represent some resistance in the context of an overall bottoming
or an uptrend. Finally, cash gold closed up a few dimes for day six up
in a row. This run in cash gold should stop right here, going down tomorrow.
Looks like everything is set up for a strong down move right now into a
very big buy signal. Will it happen... I don't know, it's a rare event,
but it's all set up right. Be very prepared to buy with everything you've
got soon if gold stocks plunge over the next 4 to 9 trading days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
As prices cross above
the 16-20 index, as is occurring now ( with ALL other indices on sells
) , it is neither a clear buy or sell, but the trend is 75% likely to be
up. If we drop hard it is a buy signal as we drop back below the 16-20
trading index. If we were at overbought levels ( the other indices already
on buys ) the current cross over above the back 16-20 prices would be a
shorting signal. If we don't fall into a buy here and just go sideways
to up ( note that the trend would still be up ) , I'll probably get no
buy signal, miss whatever rise occurs, and the index will go short again
as prices rise to the 92-96 day index ( a great short ) . The only way
for prices to decline without getting a buy signal ( i.e., a continuing
downtrend which is unlikely ) is for a VERY slow decline to occur now,
taking prices very slowly below the 16-20 prices again ( a separation of
more than one-half cycle {16-20;18/2=9 days ) from prices moving above
the 16-20 to back below the 16-20. Therefore, the trend is likely to be
up even though I don't yet have an entry signal and will not go ong until
I get the signal to do so.
I never realized how complicated this
must sound except when I try to put it into written rules. I still don't
think I'm explaining it in an intelligible manner? The trend is likely
to be up, but the mechanical system won't enter unless it's a good entry
point ( want to enter when prices fall BELOW the 16-20 day trading index,
when it's oversold ) . Hence, APH's position of 50% long is totally consistent
with what I'm saying. The trend is likely to be up but we could get the
big drop into a true mechanical system/index buy signal. Note that if I
had just stayed short from the last mechanical index signal sell signal
on 2/10/00 at userx 3.75 ( as posted on Kitco the previous day ) the index
would have been staying short since then and would continue to stay short
until a system buy. On that day, the signal came from prices rising over
the 16-20 index AND the 35-39 day index exactly simultaneously the previous
day ( as often happens ) .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Today's unchanged
day in gold stocks was very good for my index. As previously reported,
it was exactly what the doctor ordered. Unless we plunge tomorrow the 16-20
day index signal will be generated tomorrow for Thursday. Today got a +3,
yielding +3, +1, -1, -5, and -5 for -7 X 4 = -28. A change from -60 yesterday
to -28 today. We are now 2 down and 4 up. Although it would be psychologically
nice to go up tomorrow again and then fall hard, that is not required.
If we don't fall hard tomorrow the signal will be generated and a subsequent
fall within the next 10 days will give a definitive buy signal ( but not
yet a bull market signal ) .
I'm jumping the gun a little, but IF the
subsequent fall occurs, there have been 7 such trades since 1974, all marking
extended bear market lows within 2 days of the exact low. Note that these
can only occur after long downtrends when all indices are on lengthy sells.
Resulting rises in userx involving no leverage:
16% in 8 days
23% in 23 days
26% in 19 days
12% in 12 days
12% in 14 days
20% in 18 days
30% in 23 days
In all but one case the rise continued
after prices had risen back over the 16-20 day prices, usually involving
total rises of 40-100%. But not true bull markets. The last one occurred
last summer for the 18 day 20% gain which, after a mild correction, yielded
another 30% rise that the index and I did not catch. Hoping for the big
drop ( usually 10-15% ) into the great intermediate bottom buy signal to
start soon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Gold stocks looked
like they were going down today but came thru to close very slightly up
( as anticipated ) on my composite and on userx. That's very good news,
breaking the 16-20 day index for the second day, yielding a +1 for today
and a +1, -1, -5, -5, -5 , combined and multiplied by 4 to yield a move
from -84 yesterday to -60 today. If we can stay around here for 2 more
days the index will give a signal. Run is at 2 down, 3 up into a full moon.
If we go up 2 more days in a row to 2 down, 5 up that usually marks a short
term top. Hoping for hanging around here for a few more days ( a little
up or down ) and then a 5 day plunge ( 10-15% ) into this year's real buy
signal. But I've been waiting for this since April.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
I closed out my short
FSAGX on Friday AM, making less than 1%. Don't have any kind of buy signal
and still am not bullish, but figured that: ( 1 ) enough good posters here
think we're at some kind of a low that I'd go flat, ( 2 ) I kind of felt
like singing in the car on 8/3 but wasn't in a car when I saw the closing
prices, and ( 3 Importantly, any little rise on Friday would have and did
break the 16-20 day index, which usually ( 80% ) leads to a 16-20 index
signal in a few days. If that short position had been initiated/continued
from many months ago I would sit thru any rise here, but it was executed
at an already heavily sold time.
If prices don't fall much within 3 to 5
days the 16-20 index will give a contrary sell signal ( 1st level of overbought
) . An immediate ( 1-2 week ) drop to new lows will generate a significant
buy signal! A continued flat to rise from the 16-20 index signal will give
a 35-39 index buy ( still not a real buy signal; second level overbought
) and a continued flat to rise to the 92-96 index will be a definitive
index short ( currently only about 9% higher ) . When I say "only 9% higher"
that means the index will break at that point, but remember that it must
rise above that level for at least 3 days to give a signal and I never
know what could happen in those 3 days ( In 9/99 it rose about 25% in those
3 days, the most ever ) . Therefore, if prices can hang here or rise for
a few days, the only truly bearish thing that could happen would be a very
slow gradual decline to new lows. Perhaps prices will rise tomorrow into
a standard 2 down 3 up run into the full moon, hang for a few days and
then crash into or immediately after the Fed meeting for the nice buy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Note that the prices
below need to be multiplied by ten to compare to today's userx price of
2.68. Signals from July 1990 into 1993:
6/18/90 Buy executed 3.69
8/17/90 Sell and Short executed 4.70
11/16/90 Buy executed 3.36
11/30/90 Sell executed 3.40
1/15/91 Sell Short executed 3.57
3/27/91 Buy executed 2.94
7/8/91 Sell and Short 3.80
12/19/91 Buy executed 2.82
12/26/91 Sell executed 2.84
1/9/92 Sell short executed 2.97
1/21/92 Sell short 2.99
5/12/92 Sell short 2.38
3/15/93 Bull Market Buy executed 1.58
NO run analysis buy, no capitulation (
as you surmised ) to mark the 1993 bottom. In retrospect, userx made a
perfect double bottom several months apart at 1.25 and I was looking for
the buy signal in late 1992, early 1993 because it was 125 days ( by far
the longest time ever ) from the XXed out 16-20 day buy signal on 6/10/92
to the first hint of a rise on 12/7/92 when prices finally went back above
the 16-20 day index. In other words, we went from falling below the 16-20
day prices on 6/10/92 to rising above them on 12/7/92 with no other index
signals between that. The average is 40 days between signals. Currently,
we are only 27 days past the last fall thru the 16-20 day back prices on
7/3/00. We certainly can rise here or at any time and the index can't predict
it, but this should not be a major bottom ( I am very confident ) . We
just got a bearish 1 down, 2 up run, so any rise here should be short-lived
( less confident, moderately confident, since we could rise to the 92-96
day back prices at any time without the index predicting it, currently
at 12% above today's prices, before falling again ) . I am willing to state
that any rise here will simply forestall further declines, making me wait
longer to get really bullish. Please G-d don't make it go up here, I'm
tired of waiting for bullishness.
Did you see how the composition of userx
that you noted for me ( with copper, etc. added ) presaged the addition
of copper to the xau? Very strange, spooky. I just try to ignore it since
I can't explain it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Another little down
day in gold stocks today continuing the slow downtrend. Would need a 9%
or more drop in the next 3 consecutive days to start talking meaningful
bottom here. That appears unlikely as the down run for the past 2 days
has been so weak.
Barrick, I'm listening to all the posters
and most certainly hearing you. Unless we get some real capitulation, it's
unlikely that I can go long and it's also very unlikely that a rise, even
of 20% would mark a major turning point. From last March 2nd when the index
stopped me out of my one-day long position and indicated that the abyss
lay ahead ( and Kaplan went long ) , userx ( admittedly a poor upside performer
in declining markets ) is now down 20%. To me, that's a really big hit.
When the real rise comes I believe we're talking 100s of % up. I may miss
20% rises, and OFTEN have, but I'm confident that the index won't miss
the bullmarket when she comes... A true bull, according to my index ( a
92-96 day index buy signal ) , will take many months yet to unfold ( an
up move, a down move to a higher low, and then some rise ) . The next 92-96
day index buy signal is XXed out, meaning we'd have to get that XXed out
buy ( a great shorting point ) , prices would then have to fall back below
the declining 92-96 day back prices, and then quickly move back above them
for a bull market buy signal that would buy in about 20% off the bottom.
However, usually the run analysis will call the multi-year low one day
off ( after ) the day of the low. I am raising money from other investments
( trust deeds and real estate ) gradually in preparation for that day.
I am also locking in some 1-year CDs at 7.75% at ETrade Bank ( they're
giving a bonus of .5% to current account holders ) in my kids' names, such
that the interest in essentially tax-free. In the Fall of 1998 I clearly
told all I could that rates would be rising ( and I screamed the same in
the Fall of 1993 when I refinanced my home at 6.25% 15 year rate, no points
) . Now rates should/will begin a decline soon ( this prediction is based
on the falling gold price and the typical about 9 month delay between gold
movements and interest rate movements, with gold leading ) .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Today's small up day
gave us the same situation as we saw on 7/11 and 8/2, another freeking
1 up and 2 down run going into tomorrow. Same predictions as previously--
if we go down tomorrow it'll complete the 1 down 2 up run and be very very
bearish for the third time in one month. If we go up tomorrow ( or unchanged
) we'll get the first 3 up since early Feb. That will not be a buy signal
because it can be immediately be negated by 3 or more days down or a continuing
run up to 4 or 5 or more. The weakness of this retracement suggests that
we will not get the more bullish up day tomorrow, followed by 1 or 2 down
days, followed by a move to higher highs ( above tomorrow's price ) . If
we start down tomorrow, a consecutive 5 or more day plunge will mark a
capitualtion bottom ( which would be a pleasant surprise ) . So a down
day tomorrow would predict another decline to new lows on userx and a new
all-time low in xau. And all I read are bullish analysts from every link
I can get on this and other sites, despite the low "bullish consensus".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Eldorado: All gold
stocks would have to go bankrupt and be delisted from exchanges for everything
to go to zero. I cannot believe that that will happen in my lifetime. The
only measure of sentiment that I allude to is price action. Therefore,
if prices drop, I semantically refer to that as negative sentiment and
vice versa. Hence, sentiment cannot get positive as prices drop. It's just
a matter of me using words, no special meaning to "sentiment".
Barrick: I read all your posts and note
the negative stock market predictions. I don't believe that our predictions
are currently at odds. I certainly agree that gold stocks might only drop
10% or 20% from here before an intermediate term rally, but I don't want
to sit thru that because I have nothing to tell me how far they'll rise
off whatever the next low is. If your stock market predictions are accurate,
the gold stocks may get hit with the other stocks. I don't have an xau
downside target number and initiating a position after a run or index signal
has been executed is something that I try to avoid. Execute on the signal
or ASAP or skip the trade, that's the general rule. However, I can "guarantee"
that the ski index stop on my shorts will get me out at a profit from the
userx prices on 7/3/00 ( 2.91: the xxed out 16-20 day buy signal that forecast
a 20-30% drop from that level; hence, 2.10 is a reasonable profit taking
point ) , on 7/12 ( a run analysis sell at userx 2.82 ) , and now from
8/2 ( a run analysis sell at userx 2.70 ) . I don't have a number as a
stop since the number changes everyday, but if you can look at userx and
go back 16-20 days from today, today's stop would be spending several days
above those back prices ( current price at 2.64; the 16-20 back prices
are currently at 2.79, 2.82, 2.85, 2.82, and 2.80: dropping lower each
day henceforth and I would always post as we approach the stop for several
days ) . I am confident that a short initiated here will be profitable,
but the position would have to be closed out earlier then my index stop
because it was executed later. If one went short here, I'd exit on a time
basis, in 19 business days or a drop in userx of another 15-20% from here.
I am short FSAGX from 12.37 on 7/17 at 10AM. I plan to hold this position
until I get a true buy signal and it is very unlikely that I will get stopped
out on a price rise; the buy signal is highly likely to occur near a future
low. Rises will generate further shorting signals. I don't recommend options
due to time premium deterioration
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Today's big drop in
gold stocks confirms the 1 down, 2 up run completed yesterday and is very
bearish. Userx drops to new all-time low of 2.61. New xau low coming. Barrick:
there have have been no three or more ups in userx or my composite since
early Febuary ( responding to your comment ) . This is all very bearish,
as a double 1 down, 2 up pattern is rarely encountered. Don't be long.
The possibility of THE crash into a decades low is possible right now (
see yesterday's post ) . Should be short with ski. Is anybody listening?
Pray for 10 more consecutive crash days. I didn't see today ( medical tests
) , but, as you can tell I'm getting excited. It's been a perfect "short"
day.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The run analysis is
currently 1 down and 2 up again! A down day in gold stocks tomorrow would
again be very bearish ( 64 out of 64 ) . An up day would be the first three
days up since early February! If we go 3 up, that is not a run anaysis
buy signal, but gives the first sign of a possible short-term uptrend (
the 3 up could be immediately reversed by a following 3 or more days down
) . The probability of an uptrend would be about 70%. If we plunge for
the next 5 or more straight days we'd have a definitive capitulation buy
signal. However, I don't find any cycle lows due soon so that seems to
be unlikely to happen here. But I'm allowed to hope for the plunge and
a buy. Anytime we go 2 up I'm looking for the plunge buy signal ala 1976,
1982, 1993, 1998 and others.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Another trading day
and another down day in gold stocks. Userx drops 2% to all-time low of
2.64. Fsagx falls to 11.92. Now up about 4% on shorting trade. It's 20
days tomorrow from the XXed out 16-20 day index buy signal ( with userx
down 9% and fsagx down 6% ) , so a break even stop on this trade is now
assured. These declines average 40 days from the XXed out signal, so on
average have another 20 trading days and a 20% decline ahead in gold stocks.
Read Ivan Auger site as usual. He's going
commercial in a month and charging $260 a year. He's been bullish, as has
been Kaplan, for months. If I'd followed their advise I'd be down about
20% in userx. Watch out as I become more confident in myself over the next
month to exit the shorts. I'll notify you when I start singing in the car
-- seriously.
Don't invest on the following, but I note
that the 5 down day run in the stock market earlier this year has still
held as the bottom in all indices except the tech stocks, which should
go down. I've reported that that 5 down plunge run has always marked a
multi-year low in the general stock market ( e.g., S&P 500 ) and that
continues to be true despite the bearish prognostications of almost all
the advisors that I can get my eyes on. Still looking for a 5 day surge
UP to mark an all-time high as in 1987.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Signals from Aug 98
to Jan 2000:
9/1/98 BIG BUY userx 3.06 ( Probable Bull
Market )
9/29/98 Safe Sell 4.09 ( I sell )
10/8/98 Clear Sell 4.47
11/11/98 Another Sell 4.00
11/30/98 *Unexpected Multi-Year Bear Sell
Signal* 3.76
Projects 80% decline from high of 4.48.
Still in effect. But since it's so long-term, this projection is based
on only an N of 3 in the past 26 years.
1/12/99 Sell short ( Tried but couldn't
) 4.06
5/7/99 Sell short ( Tried but couldn't
) 3.99
7/13/99 Cover Shorts ( if you had been
short ) and Buy Long 3.11
7/19/99 Buy Long 3.01
8/12/99 Sell Longs 3.60
Missed 9/21-10/4 rise.
10/1/99 Sell Short ( executed ) 4.40
12/2/99 Cover Shorts and Buy Long 3.60
Start of Kitco Posting
12/30/99 Sell 3.70
1/3/00 Sell 3.70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
It's appropriate to
feel a lot of uncertainty. If prices had been rising here and the gold
stocks had closed at monthly highs yesterday, then I'd have NO uncertainty
about this 1 down 2 up run. But we're near monthly lows so it's reasonable
to be careful here about being bearish.
However, I have no concern about the effects
of auctions, leasings,etc. I really have zero concern about that. The system's
been operating thru the period you mention, 1997 to present just as well
as before. The last 2 runs of 1 down 2up occurred on 2/18/00 ( followed
instantly by 10% down ) and on 5/6/99 ( the BOE announcement occurred that
weekend so that the drop on the Monday after the announcement ended the
up run at 2 up, making the bearish pattern complete and yielding an immediate
20+% drop after that Monday big drop. However, each of those runs occurred
right at highs after solid moves up. I could go on and on with examples.
On 3/22/99 ( a secondary high ) got that run and dropped 10% over 12 trading
days. 10/7/99 was a beauty-- look at a chart. But that was also a big high.
The next one back was a fairly bad, inaccurate 1 down 2 up run on 7/7/98
where prices rose about 9% higher in 2 weeks, then fell 25% below the 2
up run price.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The gold stocks closed
down today completing the bearish 1 down 2 up run. The run marks an exact
high 75% of the time and almost exactly the high the other 25%. I'll be
going short as soon as possible, needing an up day to short the stocks.
The stop will be complex and unlikely requiring up and down movements.
I'll be gone on Sat. for 2 weeks, but will leave a message or two with
Norwester if the stop is hit ( almost impossible in that time frame ) .
The small drop today made prices fall back very slightly below the resistance
of the 35-39 day back prices that were hit yesterday. The most interesting
possibility for the bulls is a complete and immediate collapse right now
( and I mean it has to be immediately and every day down ) every day for
5 or more days to provide a 2 up 5 or more big run down. Unlikely to happen,
but if it does the run analysis would then buy at the bottom for a significant
rally. A collapse of 8 or more days would mark a super bull market ( again,
don't get excited, there's an extraordinary low probability of that happening
) . Kaplan notes that we've turned bearish as a site. The daily xau is
oversold while the hourly is overbought. Perhaps a few more mish-mash days
up and down before a major downwave unfolds. I have to be very bearish
over the next month or more.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Today's up day makes
the current run an important 1 down, 2 up. As stated many times, it therefore
follows that if we go down tomorrow the 1 down, 2 up run would complete
and this would be completely bearish, basically always ( about 63 out of
63 times now ) . However, an up day tomorrow of any magnitude would finally
turn the run analysis bullish, the first time since late Jan/first day
of Feb. My gold composite and userx have both risen into the back 35-39
day prices today. This marks some resistance, but if we can go up tomorrow
and stay there for a day or two, we'll get the bypassed 35-39 day index
buy. Thereafter, a slight fall and a hold at userx 2.80 will generate the
long awaited intermediate term buy. If we go down tomorrow, the initiation
of shorts ASAP is clearly signaled. There is, of-course, the BOE auction
result tomorrow and the action tomorrow will give a run analysis signal
either clearly bearish or bullish. The shorting position would be executed
ASAP. The long position would wait for about 5 or 6 business days. My personal
guess is .... bearish but actually worthless. See what happens tomorrow
for the answer from the run analysis.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Yesterday I ( not
the index ) started to "smell some bullish possibilities" coming and today
demonstrated the uselessness of my feelings and the necessity of following
the system. USERX dropped thru 2.80 ( closing at 2.79 ) to a new all-time
low. Maybe gold stocks can still rise the needed 2% in the next few days
and then fall to a buy signal, but my feelings of bullish possibilities
are gone and traditional technical analysis of this leading indicator show
it continuing to be a dog, predicting lower prices for the gold complex.
Apparently the 75% odds of a major drop will hold this time and the gold
stocks are heading down over the next 4-8 weeks by 20-30%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Although the indices
won't/can't turn intermediate term bullish until a little rise and little
fall back to userx 2.80, the signs based on my experience are turning more
bullish. For example, Paul Merriman's system e-mailed me today with a sell
signal. Since they've been wrong now 16 out of about 17 times in the past
2 years, this will probably be the little low that my indices need. Marantette
( Gold stock letter ) is still on a sell. Kaplan selling some nicely last
week. And did Mooney get stopped out yesterday or today? WileE, although
excellent IMO, will probably be on the sidelines with me tomorrow. Barrick
also an excellent poster IMO went perfectly 50% long yesterday. I'm starting
to smell it. Lots of longs giving up and some smarts going TENTATIVELY
long. Expecting that the stocks will now hold up better than gold. Let's
hope we have another LITTLE up day tomorrow in gold stocks. We're approaching
the apex of a descending triangle in userx at 2.80 again over the next
2 weeks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
This was a good day
for the gold stocks. Gold fell but the stocks rose slightly and userx moved
above the critical 2.80 level. Barrick's ( the poster ) buy signal from
yesterday looks OK, although the only way for my indices to give a buy
is for gold stocks to rise just 2% over the next four days ( to give a
35-39 index buy that is bypassed ) and then fall back to userx 2.80 ( to
give a 35-39 index sell without rising over the back 16-20 index prices
) to give a buy around 7/20 on a one day rise over userx 2.80 ( to give
an executable 35-39 index buy for an intermediate 15-20% rally into a major
shorting signal ) . Although I will be on vacation in Alaska, Norwester
has gratiously agreed to accept a call from me and post at that time IF
this scenerio occurs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
I feel like saying,
"What did I tell ya?", but I'll be wrong too often in the future. Userx
hit exactly 2.80 today. It's hard to fathom, but a penny can make all the
difference. It held support today! The xxed index signal was for Monday,
so it's possible that it missed a crappy low by one day too early. Or the
gold stocks will break thru to the downside. If USERX ever closes below
2.80, we're going down as per the xxing out on Monday's buy signal, down
20-30% in the gold stocks. Strong hearts who have another system that makes
them bullish have an entry point right here and now with an instant stop
on any lower close. Since the probabilities are 75% that we will break
to the downside, I stand aside until the index and/or run analysis require
this faint heart to risk capital. The current run is 1 up and 2 down ....
if we go down tomorrow the run will again be very bearish at 1 up and 3
down plus we will have broken all support. I guess we'll go up tomorrow?
( otherwise it's all too clear and easy that we're going down and markets
don't make it clear and easy ) . A fairly big important move on the day
after a long weekend, with such moves usually being attributable ( for
the gullible fundamentalists! smile ) to some kind of fundamental announcement
( e.g., central bank sales, oil output increases, or some other event that
the gov'ts always seem to save for a long weekend when the technicals call
for it ) .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Re: 1995-1996 buy,
sell, short signals ( no trouble at all ) :
3/3/95 Buy userx 2.16
3/10/95 Sell userx 2.30
8/3/95 Buy userx 2.37
9/5/95 Sell userx at loss 2.24
12/5/95 Buy userx 1.99
12/13/95 Sell userx 1.99 ( no gain )
12/15/95 Buy userx 1.96
2/5/96 Sell userx 2.58 ( Note the sell
was a 443 day index XXed out buy signal coupled with the deadly 1 down
2 up run on the day of a full moon ) . This was one day after the 1993-1996
high in most gold stock indices ( e.g., xau ) , but userx was way below
its 1993-96 high recorded on 10/20/94 at 3.26!!! This 1 down, 2 up, 6 down
pattern was supposed to and did mark a multi-year high in most indices.
2/5/96 Short userx at 2.58 ( but can't
short that fund, have to short a group of indiv stocks, and had to wait
for a ten percent drop before getting one up day to go short! ) .
9/19/96 Add to or initiate more shorts
at userx 1.77.
Maintain shorts until buy signal on 1/12/98
at userx .51
1/12/98 Buy userx at .51
1/30/98 Sell userx at .57
4/24/98 Short userx at .58
6/18/98 Cover shorts and go long at userx
.37
7/8/98 Sell userx at .40 ( actually 4.00
after 10 for 1 reverse split )
9/1/98 BUY USERX AT 3.06 ( .306 )
7/5/00 PRICE .28 ( 2.80 ) Ties all-time
low. Not a bull market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Gold stocks ( as per
my composite and userx ) went down slightly today. Therefore, the run analysis
avoided the important 1 down 2 up and is
at a meaningless 1 up and 1 down. The
xxed out 16-20 index buy signal executed today at userx 2.91, not near
userx 2.80 ( the prior 2 lows ) . I don't like it from a bulls standpoint.
We'll see on Wed, but I still clearly do not want to be long. I repeat
that this is not a bull market in gold stocks and it'll take take quite
some up and down movement to change that statement. Continue to preserve
your capital.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
An xxed out buy of
this type has never yielded more than a 4-5% rise until it sells out (
goes back over the prior 16-20 day prices ) . Currently those back prices
are only 2% above current prices, so that occurrence seems likely again
if we are going up at all. Note that it takes at least 3 days to generate
a signal and a day to execute it, so a dynamite one would rise 2-5% or
more a day for those few days to yield a profit of 10-25%. Had one dynamite
one that took 16 days to start to rise ( but never fell below the buy in
price ) , then rose 30% in the last four days ( 20% in the last 2 days
) . Here we could rise a little, get a sell, then rise a little and get
a true 35-39 day buy for a nice rise. But need to go home and check if
we had an up or down day today for the run analyses.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Gold stocks rose today
( contrary to my expectations ) , but failed to rise enough to avoid the
next index signal, the 16-20 index buy signal to be executed on Monday.
Remember, this often dynamite buy signal is not executable because it is
once again XXed out, portending a 25% prob of a small rise and a 75% prob
of a major fall soon. I was and still am hoping that userx will fall into
support at 2.80 on Monday, but since it rose today to 2.92, it seems unlikely
that it will drop 4% on Monday, a fairly dead day. This is scarey. If the
stocks are unchanged or up a little on Monday, the run will be at down
one and up two heading into Wed.. If they then go up on Wed, we'll have
the first bullish run pattern since the end of January! But, if they go
down on Wed, I'm giving early warning now that that would be an executable
shorting pattern ( more on that if we go up on Monday ) . So perhaps we'll
just go down a little on Monday to keep the run analyses uncertain ( but
really still bearish since I've not gotten one bullish run since late Jan
) . In any case, the one thing that is for certain is that the 16-20 index
did give it's signal today for Monday, forecasting nothing particularly
great in the very short-term for the bulls. The day after long weekends
( Wed now ) have the single highest probability of setting important market
directions in the gold stocks. Happy holiday weekend!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Gold stocks got hit
hard today following the 35-39 day index sell executed yesterday. The indices
haven't been wrong in a long time. Gold stocks will continue to fall, as
previously expected, into Monday as the 16-20 day index will give its signal
tomorrow to be executed Monday. This is an instant replay of the past two
months, with the 16-20 day index giving an XXed out signal at the end of
each month followed by a crappy rise and a return to userx all-time low
of 2.80. Expecting userx to hit 2.80 again on Monday.
One could, once again, go long on Monday.
However, it'll be the same 25% probability of a small rise and a 75% chance
of a continuing large fall. If one goes long on Monday, however, one has
an immediate stop if userx falls below 2.80 on a closing basis at any time.
So it's a low risk, low reward situation and I'll continue to wait. If
the pattern continues, after Monday we'll get an even smaller rise in gold
stocks than the one in early May and then early June, followed a very slow
decline back to userx 2.80 at the end of July. The pattern in the indices
would again be a 35-39 day buy signal after Monday's 16-20 day signal is
executed, which would be non-executable ( off the trading path ) followed
by a 16-20 day sell as prices rose a little over the back prices, followed
by a slow decline. How boring can this get and how patient do we have to
be? Wish I had an index that could predict 2 or 3 day moves so that I could
do SOMETHING!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
I posted last night.
35-39 index was selling today. If gold stock prices rise today and rise
a few more days I'll enter long on the next 35-39 day index buy ( the breakout
) , but no buy here. Today would be day 3 up on a 2 down 3 up run. I would
not enter longs here, consider selling. I'm off to class. Couldn't get
on Kitco for an hour--server busy, so I knew gold was moving.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
As projected ( no
great projection ) the 35-39 day index gave its sell signal today to be
executed tomorrow. Some chance of it marking a low, but the gold stocks
would need to drop about 3% tomorrow for there to be any chance of a low
tomorrow. Now that the 35-39 index has sold ( not a shorting signal or
a buying signal ) the index is open to execute a 35-39 day buy signal immediately
IF that is the next signal. Unfortunately, the 16-20 day index broke yesterday
and more today. If prices don't rise before Friday, that index will give
an XXed buy signal. That means it's giving another crappy buy signal to
be executed next Monday with the buy signal once again having a 25% prob
of a small ( 4% or less ) rise and a 75% prob of a large drop ( falling
more than 20% ) . Since most here are looking for bullish signals, the
ski indices could turn bullish as follows:
1. After this 35-39 index sell ( and a
3% drop tomorrow ) the gold stocks immediately rise to above the back 35-39
day prices, thereby avoiding the 16-20 index signal.
2. After the 35-39 index sell tomorrow,
prices continue to drift down to userx 2.80 on Friday or Monday generating
the 16-20 index xxed out buy signal, we get a small rise to generate a
16-20 index sell signal ( as prices rise over the back 16-20 day prices
) thereby ending that trade at a small profit. Then gold stock prices continue
to rise a little to generate a new 35-39 day index buy which would be executable.
An intermediate term rise. This scenario seems more likely than #1.
The bearish scenario is that prices drift
down to userx 2.80, generating the 16-20 index signal that is xxed out,
prices then rise for 2 days or three crappy days before dropping thru userx
2.80 and declining for two months about 30% ( in gold stocks ) . A break
of support at userx 2.80 will look very very very very bearish. Watch out
for it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
A number of index
signals and runs are likely this week. My system has remained bearish since
early March, but some interesting patterns will develop this week. It's
extremely likely, just about certain, that we'll get a 35-39 day signal
executed this Wed. I note that this coincides with others' predictions
for a low on Wed. Just because it's a 35-39 sell signal does not mean to
short. This signal here will mark a critical point and I don't know if
it is a real buy or sell signal. More importantly, the 16-20 index will
break on Monday and will probably give a contrary buy ( remember that as
prices fall below the 16-20 day back prices that is a sell on the index,
but the index is contrary: it's a buy ) . However, that buy signal is xxed
out, meaning a 25% prob of a small quick gain again and a 75% prob of a
major decline. The most bullish pattern is therefore a drop into Wed (
userx 2.80 again ) then a rise to avoid the 16-20 day signal, followed
very shortly by a beautiful 35-39 index buy the following week ( a real
buy! ) . Alternatively, if prices fall into Wed and stay flat till Friday,
the 16-20 will give its signal. If that is the low ( as many others predict
a low on June 30th, Friday ) , the ensuing rise will yield an fast 16-20
day contrary sell for the 25% probability of a small profit and THEN (
hopefully ) the 35-39 index real buy. Hey-- does this finally sound possibly
bullish after this week for the first time since the end of Febuary? The
bearish ski indices may be bullish soon. Note that we are 1 up and 2 down,
expecting a down day on Monday for the bearish 1 up 3 down run again, but
we might continue to decline slightly on Tuesday and/or Wed yielding a
potential weak bottom 1 up and 5 down run by Wed. When userx hits 2.80
( exactly ) this week, buyers should come in for a few days even if we
subsequently plunge. Fly or die time hits by the week after this week -
latest. The timing of the above statements is "certain", the direction
after them is still not certain. None of this bullishness will change the
long-term downtrend in gold stocks. The middle to end of this week would
be the time to buy the calls to complete the straddle position initiated
with the puts from two weeks ago. The trading range will resolve itself
the week after this week. Try not to jump the gun on a pure long or short
position, a fake out move usually occurs in these situations ( e.g., a
2 day move up off this week's bottom followed by a downside breakout, or,
a dip at the end of the week or the first two days of the following week
to below support - userx 2.80 - followed by the intermediate rise with
a valid 35-39 day index buy signal ) .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Looks like another
little down day in the gold stocks today. 35-39 day index gave +3 on Wed,
+1 on Thurs, and will give a -1 today. Will almost certainly give the 35-39
day sell signal on Tuesday, executed on Wed. This is as I have expected
and posted. Note how the 35-39 day buy that was NOT on the path will end
up selling at a loss or no profit. That's why it was not on the path! Userx
still likely to return to it's all-time low at exactly 2.80 next week,
yesterday closing at 2.89. Then the ski indices will be open for business
on the next up or down move.
If any technically knowledgable Kitcoite
knows how to interpret a descending triangle, let's hear from you. Userx
went from 2.80 to 3.13 ( in one day ) , returned to 2.80 ( taking 19 days
) , went up to 3.02 ( in 8 days, around the 61.8% Fib # ) , and is now
returning to 2.80 ( in about 9 days ) to complete the base of the triangle
next week.
Have been examining the relative merits
of different gold mutual funds, primarily the dog userx vs. fsagx ( Fidelity
) . As I had previously posted, my beliefs in thi comparison were born
out. Userx goes down more than fsagx in bear markets ( most of the past
13 years that fsagx has existed ) . During the 1993 bull, userx made an
initial rise of 142%, fsagx 86%. userx then fell 37%, with fsagz falling
only 21%. userx then flew 77%, with fsagx gaining 49% ( all numbers close,
but approximate ) . Userx is more volatile and when we get to a bull, it's
preferable. Alternatively, when userx outperforms, it's likely that the
golds are in a bull.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The triangle is definitely
below any and all moving averages since it's occurring at all-time lows.
I was hoping it would be bullish. My own idea is that if the price then
rises over the down trend line connecting the 2 previous triangle highs
( 3.13 and 3.02 ) that it's a potential breakout and will yield a 35-39
day buy on the path that is executable. Alternatively, if it ends up falling
below 2.80 after an attempt to break out to the upside, it would be bearish
and correspond to the index giving its XXed 16-20 day buy signal ( a buy
signal that should be bad ) as prices fall below the back 16-20 day prices.
Actually, the original concern was that
the system was developed using too much BULL market data. We developed
it in 1984 using 1972 to 1984 data. If I remember correctly, 72-74 was
bear, 74-80 was bull, 80-82 was bear, 82-84 was bullish. System works better
in a bull market because it's geared to go long primarily, harder to get
the right shorting points, which rely on XXed out buy signals ( buy signals
that are predicted to be bad ) , as opposed to index sell signals. For
example, the upcoming 35-39 day sell signal is not necessarily a good shorting
point.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Still nothing defintive
to report from ski's perspective. The very small up day in gold stocks
today at least avoided another bearish run ( avoided the 1 up 3 down run
) . Now at 2 down 1 up. The 35-39 day index started breaking towards a
sell at +3. I believe that the xau closed its open up gap today. It would
be great if we finally moved solidly up within the next 2 or 3 days, but
with the Fed meeting coinciding with the day that the 35-39 index will
yield a sell, and me having no indicators that are bullish, I'm guessing
that we'll still drift back down a little to userx 2.80 for the third time
and get a 35-39 day sell ( which will still not be a definitive signal,
but which should end the narrowing trading range one way or another next
week ) . Wish I could state a definitive prediction and finally put my
money to work/at risk, but still waiting and getting impatient. I state
and know that markets go nowhere at least a third of the time, but it's
still always hard to live through. Cheers to all, but I'm getting weary
of being patient.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Reify: I've stated
this before, but I think it's important enough to repeat this view. That
1998 buy spike was a buy spike! However, it was only 7 straight days down
( after 2 UP ) . Not enough historically for a true bull. At that time,
although the run analysis and I bought, I was bullish but concerned/confused
that the buy spike didn't meet historical standards for a long-term rise.
That concern ( uncertainty ) was confirmed by a long-term triple index
sell about a month later. The third such triple sell in history. The other
two led to the massive waves down in gold from 1980 and from 1996. Such
triple sell down waves may take a year or two to really begin and may take
3-5 years to complete. 1998 + 3= 2001 or +5= 2003. In my work, that buy
spike was negated by reported/alleged Central Bank/Cabal intervention on
10/8/98. Market opened way up, closed slightly down at the exact time to
negate a ski index bull market pattern and turn it into a long-term bearish
scenario ( that should be the last bearish scenario we see ) . Boy, was
I disappointed/upset for months in late 1998.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Not a good day in
the gold stock arena today as stocks fell while spot gold closed up ...
a measly 10 cents. One would hope the stocks would close up tomorrow to
avoid another bearish run of 1 up and 3 down ( currently at 1 up 2 down
) . If we go down tomorrow, what'll that be?, it seems like 25 straight
bearish runs in the last 4 months without too much price decline. 35-39
day index on userx will start to break towards a sell tomorrow if prices
don't rise about 7%. That size rise seems unlikely to happen. Kaplan sounding
short term bearish tonight. To repeat, the short sell, if it occurs over
the next six days, opens the index to an intermediate short buy that is
executable if prices then rise over the 35-39 day back prices before they
fall below the 16-20 back prices ( which are at their lows for the next
about 2 weeks ) . So IF userx falls back to 2.80 to yield the 35-39 day
sell and then rises again, there's a chance for a true buy signal. If prices
fall below the 16-20 back prices after a 35-39 sell, that buy signal will
be on the path but will NOT be executable ( it'll be XXed out, setting
the opportunity for the next Extended Ski tutorial on XXing out rules on
a weekend ) . You can tell that thruout these weeks, although the index
has been indeterminate, the runs and SKI have been bored to bearish. APH
and others caught that 3 day nice rise in physical gold, but the stocks,
which I focus on, have failed to respond.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Tyrant asked for an
update, but there's nothing new to report. Index is not long or short.
Run analysis has not been bullish for months. Userx in now 4.5% above it's
all-time low. More and more restricted trading range continues in the gold
stocks, preparing for the next fly or die. Time passing, such that by this
Wed ( in 2 days ) the 35-39 back prices will start to rise and the 35-39
index will sell in 7 days unless we rise to/above the early May prices.
Tyrant, it's going to be hard to make any money here because we're drying
up, market to decide soon on a major direction. If the 35-39 sells, the
index is open, a 35-39 index buy will be executed, but a fall to new lows
will generate an NON executable 16-20 day buy signal and the same probs
from the last one will apply ( 75% prob of major decline, 25% prob of minor
rise ) . Generally, buy dips and sell quickly, short rises and cover quickly
( 1 or 2 days ) . Or straddle, buying puts on strength and calls on weakness.
Will userx return to the all-time low of 2.80 in the next few days??? 2.80
to 3.13 ( May ) , 2.80 to 3.02 ( June ) , 2.80 to ?? ( July ) . Note that
the most basic technical rule that rising markets should spend more days
rising than falling still has not occurred. This very simple analysis continues
to show that the market rises quickly, then spends many days gradually
declining. This is bearish!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Gold share prices
holding "due" to 16-20 sell signal up to one-half cycle, 9 days. Must fly
within 7 days and counting down, or die. If doesn't fly, will yield a 35-39
day sell ( as those prices will spike up ) . Note the coincidence of the
index time periods with the next Fed meeting ( this is typical ) . Still
unpredictable to me, but the run analysis remains negative. A reasonable
and highly likely profitable strategy is to straddle by buying slightly
out of the money calls on dips ( like today ) and slightly out of the money
puts on rises ( in gold or the stocks ) with the prediction that a major
move 15-20% up or down will occur within the next 20 trading days. If we
break to the upside the top is predicted in 17 trading days and counting
down. Please note how I am not a trader, but a position player waiting
for the very high probability situation. The best will be the nice rise
scenario over the next 17 days into a major shorting opportunity. I'll
consider myself very fortunate if this rise occurs now. Remember how 3
months ago I was able to make multiple accurate predictions but stated
that that was unusual. Since then the gold shares have gone nowhere with
a slight downside bias. I've stood aside, but that should end within the
next 7 to 17 trading days. Hoping for the rise very soon, but don't know,
evidence still tends to point down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
So, the index ended
up being correct when it predicted that the 16-20 day trade from 5/31 to
today would be a loser or be a crappy winner. It had predicted a 4% gainer
if it was good or a 20% loser. It was good at 4.5% ( userx 2.80, the low,
to 2.94 today ) . Moreover, the sell signal from yesterday executed today
looks like it hit the day of the high ( intraday at least ) . I'm pleased
that it worked out the way it was supposed to, the way it was predicted,
close to being "science". The next signals could be a 92-96 buy ( if it
takes off 20% to the upside ) , a short sell, or a short-short sell ( a
buy ) . If the short sell comes next, that's death. That would happen if
prices fall very slowly over the next 9 days. If they fall fast it'll give
a true 16-20 index buy on the path that occurs within 11 days of the 16-20
day sell ( executed today ) . Unfortunately, given the current index patterns,
that kind of buy signal here would be very very rare ( but possible ) .
If they rise over the next 17 days to the 92-96 index signal that'll be
a definitive short. Still being patient and was also a "patient" again
as the stupid physicians finally drew the liquid out of my chest while
the gold stocks were starting to fall. Hope your doing okay as the market
pops up and down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
16-20 Index sell is
executed at the close today, ending the supposedly "crappy" 16-20 index
buy from 5/31's close. Renotong this from yesterday evening because earlier
yesterday I had mistakenly stated that sell would be executed tomorrow.
Nope, today. 5/31's "crappy" buy signal has not turned out to be too "crappy",
will make about 7% in 9 days. I state the odds henceforth as 50-50, but
within 9 trading days the gold stocks have to "fly or die". Just as traders
had a good risk/reward going long on the 35-39 day buy signal several days
ago, now one has a fairly good risk/reward going short using a mental stop
of a second day close over today's closing gold stock prices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
You asked for it and
there's not much definitiveness to report. Nice strong up day in the stocks.
16-20 index went to a +5, 35-39 index went to a +5. If they stay up tomorrow
we'll get a signal ( prices over the 16-20 day index ) which is executed
on Wed. That'll end the 16-20 index trading buy from last Wed that I couldn't
execute ( at a profit ) . If/When that signal happens the market will clearly
have to fly or die because if it then falls below the 35-39 day prices
we'll get a "dreaded" double sell ( 35-39 day back prices are falling to
the lows ) . Or it will fly up 20% to the 92-96 day prices. I'm not supposed
to be long but that doesn't mean that it won't fly! If it goes up I will
make a clear prediction that the top will be in 17-22 trading days from
the 35-39 day buy execution ( 17-22 business days from 6/8 ) as prices
go over the 92-96 day back prices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Bearish run analysis
( 3 up, 3 down ) and neutral to bearish ski index path makes me predict
a slow continuing decline in gold stocks this week. The current run usually
ends at 3 up 4 or 5 down, so looking for 1 or 2 down days followed by some
very weak up days. Looks like the same scenario that we had after the May
2 run up of a few days followed by three weeks of gradual down. Now had
the early June 3 day run up to be followed by several weeks of weak downside
action. Userx appears to be forming a descending triangle ( 2.80 up to
3.13 in MAy, down to 2.80 and up to 3.01 [Fib 61.8%] in June to now slowly
retrace to 2.80 again in June ) . Boring, corrections, no real movement
for months. Pleased to have remained in money market funds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The ski index ( not
me ) predicts .50-1.00 on userx (now at 2.89; all-time high of 104.40)
within 1-2 years then a gigantic rally that will probably never recover
104.4 from 1980.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The index path system
determines which of the 3 indices' buy and sell signals is followed for
trading/investing. The terminology used here will be employed henceforth:
16-20 index= short-short ( SS ) , 35-39 index=short ( S ) , 92-96 index=long
( L ) . Remember that the SS is contrary ( when prices fall below the back
16-20 day prices ( a sell ) it is executed as a BUY signal and vice versa.
This insures that one buys at oversold levels and sells at overbought levels.
The S and L buy when prices go above the corresponding back prices and
sells when the index turns from + to -. ( Search earlier this year extended
posts if you don't understand what I'm talking about and want to learn
) .
The index which controls is the index
that buys first. On tied signals the higher-order ( longer term ) index
controls the path. Control does not switch until the index in control sells
out or loses control.
Examples:
1. S and L are on sells, SS gives a sell
( a rise over 16-20 day prices ) and falls to a buy. A great buy. Prices
rise to an S buy and THEN an SS sell. Control stays with the SS until it
has sold.
2. Same as #1. Prices rise to a S buy
then fall to an S sell before an SS sell. SELL. The longer term index sell
takes precedence always.
We are currently on an SS buy ( not executed
for other reasons not yet explained ) , rose to an S buy, have not yet
reached an S sell or fallen to an S sell. SS buy was supposed to lose or
not gain much. Current prices sitting right at S sell area ( if we fall
) and right at SS sell area ( if we rise ) . Do the numbers day to day,
it's always amazing to watch the market follow the back price lines.
3. Same as #1 but now the SS sell day
ties ( exactly ) with the S buy day. Extremely common. Control transfers
to the S buy, an "intermediate" term buy. S sells when one gets an S sell
or or L sell ( if prices rise to the L buy and then it sells ) .
4. Same as #1 but the SS sells before
the S buys. Technically, supposed to exit on SS sell and re-enter, but
usually the S buy will occur within a day or two of the SS sell and should
the S buy not occur, the only thing that can happen if prices fall back
is another SS buy.
5. Prices rise without an SS buy on the
path first. That would mean that you had a previous SS buy that was not
on the path followed by a S or L sell, and then prices rose to a S buy
or an L buy. If get an S buy the trade continues until an S sell or an
L sell ( if prices rose to an L buy after the S buy ) . Alternatively if
prices had risen to an L buy tied with the S buy or an L buy before the
S buy, control would be on the L index ( the definition of a BULL Market!
) . The most common way of getting a bull market ( e.g., 1993 ) is to get
an S buy on the path followed by a L buy ( not on the path therefore )
, followed by an L sell ( without an S sell; therefore the L sell ends
the S buy trade and the index is open for any buy signal to be on the path
) , followed quickly by a new L buy.
The same path rules will apply to the
longer term set of 3 indices ( but note that these interestingly turn out
to be inverted from the shorter set of 3 indices ) : the 660-664 index
is the equivalent to the 16-20 index ( the 664 here is the trading index!
) , the 439-443 index which is the equal to the S index, and the 218-222
index which is the equal to the bull market L index. These are obviously
less validated and don't come into play for years at a time.
If you're really understanding and are
astute, you could realize that one could get a SS buy, then a S buy, followed
by an S sell, followed by another SS buy as prices fall. That second SS
buy is NOT executed, it's XXed out in our terms. This XXing out procedure
is very important because markets just don't stay in trading ranges ( 16-20
buy and sell signals ) but break thru to the downside, thru the SS buy
signals. The XXing rules will be described on another weekend when we get
to the next XXing out instance in real life. Note that S buys and L buys
can also be XXed out. For example, on 2/10/00 the index gave the common
tied SS sell and S buy signals tied ( transferring control to the S index
) . Why did we sell at userx 3.75 and then recommend going short? The S
index buy was XXed out, making it a sell signal. Starting to sound like
it'll be too complicated? Nah, not after further rules and some practice.
If you're wanting to follow and learn this, I'd suggest printing out this
page and the prior extended instructional posts.
The path is, of-course not always correct.
Around 80% correct, but the rules avoid losses. The most common error is
an SS buy on the path, followed by an S buy, followed by an SS sell, and
the market continues to rise to a L buy while the index is on the sidelines
after the SS sell. That's a possible happening right now and why I state
that I'm not buying, but the stop - the S sell - is just a few % away on
the downside and the L buy is up 25% ( a good risk/reward, but the odds
favor getting the S sell next based on the path and the fact that the 5/31
SS buy signal was XXed out and was not executable yielding the prediction
that the SS Buy to SS sell trade, if the SS sell occurs, will yield little
profit ) .
Always happy to answer questions, explain
in other words, or hear criticism of the index/rules/procedures. Many of
the path patterns DO conform to traditional TA, such as double bottoms
yielding a tied SS buy and S buy. As an exercise in understanding, try
to picture or draw that scenario ) , but the advantage is that it's objective!
( a signal is a signal, period ) . Let's hope the indices give a high probability
on the path signal soon, it's been 3 months!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
All of my posts relate
to gold stocks, not to the stock market. My sytem is NOT supposed to buy
because the 35-39 day signal is not "on the path of trades" ( to be explained
at a later time ) . The path is still on the 16-20 day index buy signal
from last Wed that had/has only a low probability of being very good. I
am not buying today. I was saying however, that those who have been waiting
and believe in something other than my system ( which can miss these kinds
of rises; and there appear to be lots of good systems posted on Kitco that
say to be long gold stocks ) have a fairly decent entry point here. It's
a reasonable thing to go long here, but my rules do not have me going long.
Remember, my system rules strive to avoid losses even if it means missing
some potential gains. I do know that all of this is not the start of some
great bull market. If the market rises, it's a trade, and the better trade
will come in shorting the gold stocks after the rise ( should one occur
) .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The 35-39 day index
buy signal was given today, executed at the close tomorrow. Probabilities
are about 70% that we'll go up about 20-25% over the next month, 30% that
we'll go right down to below the back 35-39 day prices for about a 5% loss.
Those odds aren't bad. The remaining problem, however, is somewhat complicated
to explain, but involves a concept I have not mentioned: the path and index
control. There are 3 indices 16-20, 35-39, and 92-96. Which signal is executed/in
control when? The index currently in control is the 16-20. This remains
in control until that trade ends ( prices rise back over the 16-20 back
prices ) . That has not happened yet. Therefore, we are still on the questionnable
buy signal from last Wed's close ( which has to date, retrospectively,
hit the xau low and userx low on the nose ) . Until that trade ends, the
path remains with the 16-20 index in control and this 35-39 day buy signal
is simply bypassed. This procedure, of-course, has sometimes been wrong,
but it is safe ( avoids losses ) . Based on reading all the posters here,
I believe that they'll be right and prices will rise, but I'm personally
continuing to avoid buying or selling until I get the "close to perfect"
set-up. If by some improbability this path is right and prices decline
right back to the previous lows, the index may give such a true clear buy
signal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Current run at down
2, up 3 indicating a bottom achieved and/or a top in place if down tomorrow.
Many wondering why the shares have underperformed -- should not be a surprise.
That signal ( falling under the 16-20 day prices ) from last Wed had a
25% prob of yielding around a 4% profit from Wed until prices rose over
the 16-20 day prices. That rise over 16-20 day prices is highly likely
to be executed on Friday, therefore, expecting prices to linger and fall
until that signal on close on Friday, down 2-3% from current prices to
fulfill the predictionof a possible 4% gain. MOREOVER, IF shares rise tomorrow
or fall less than 3.5% tomorrow ( userx close over 3.91 ) the 35-39 day
intermediate index will give its buy signal to be executed the next day,
on the close on Thursday, followed by the 16-20 overbought signal executed
on Friday. Probably an intermediate buy signal finally achieved causing
a rise over the next 20 trading days to the shorting trade of the year
as prices reach the 92-96 index. Gold's been amazing compared to the shares--
I predict the shares. Continued CHEERS! It's nice to have some action and
we've had some stupendous posters lately ( I read and appreciate all of
you ) .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
While I sat for an
hour today drinking barium prior to a CAT scan, I watched an interview
on a business/market channel with the head of the Edcational Foundation
on Money. The interviewer started out asking, "You're not a goldbug are
you?", and the expert responded "Worse than that. All fiat money systems
have historically ended in the fiat being equal to the cost of production
-- zero. As this happens the rich lose wealth, the professionals make less,
and the workers who rely on pensions, etc., lose everything. It's unfair
and it will happen."
( My comments ) Whether it's inflation,
deflation, or most probably inflationary depression, gold is the only true
money and it will always be that way. Period. Fortunately that time is
not yet here. Unfortunately that time is not yet here. My system's estimate
is within one to two years. Begin gathering cash to be able to buy gold
in that time period. Tomorrow marks important 222 and 443 cycle dates from
the 1998 low AND the July 1999 low in gold stocks. These prices currently
represent resistance as we are in a down trend. If we go up nicely tomorrow
this resistance is about 4% higher than current gold stock prices. It's
highly unlikely that we'd go much above that. So if we go up tomorrow I
would expect us to hit that resistance. If we go down tommorrow, it's another
breakthru to the downside -- with a run pattern currently at 1 up and 2
down, a down day tomorrow will give us another very bearish 1 up 3 down
pattern and a probable breakthru of Sharefin's beautiful gold sentiment
chart to the downside. Note that I care not about fundamentals such as
this supposedly important report that comes out tomorrow. I don't believe
that the report matters but people will respond in the psychologically
correct direction no matter what the report says ( there'll be somebody
stating the market's interpretation that justifies the movement whichever
direction the gold market goes -- it's verbal diarrhea to me ) . Cheers!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
FundaMETALists' 5/27
2:30 post summarized the recent/current run and index situation perfectly,
but neglected to note that on Wed 5/24 userx did close down, forming the
bearish 1 down 2 up run that I warned about before I left on Tuesday. Had
we gone up that Wed it would have be a bullish 1 down 3 up, but by going
down, YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN that gold/gold stocks were going down thereafter.
Folks, that 1 down, 2 up pattern continues to perform at basic perfection
for all these years.
The current 2 up, 3 down pattern is unlikely
to meet the criteria for what we've come to call the great capitulation
run down. After three days we're only down 2-3%, a standard weak 1% a day
down run, not the 2% a day required. Yes, we could accelerate to the downside
and make the run into a buy signal, but such true capitulations have never
started weakly like this. So I'm not excited about the prospects of getting
a run analysis buy here at a major bottom. Plus if we get the prices falling
below the back 16-20 prices, it would make not sense to get an index bearish
signal coupled with a run analysis buy signal.
FundaMETAList also correctly summarized
the index situation. The past five days of signs are +5 ( 5/22 ) , +5 (
5/23 ) , +1 ( 5/24 ) , -3 ( 5/25 ) , and -3 ( 5/26 ) . Added together X
4 = +20 on Friday. Thursday 5 day total was also +20, 20 - 20 = 0, so there
was no velocity component to add to the +20 index number on Friday. Tomorrow
gold stock prices will have to rise about ten percent to avoid the index
sign turning from positive to negative.
I certainly would not want to be long,
the odds are bad from my system's perspective. However, they are only odds,
probabilities, so we could rise 10% tomorrow or the signal that comes on
Tuesday could end up yielding a very small rise, but most of the time right
at the day of the signal the gold stocks will fall hard breaking perceived
technical support levels and that will not be a bottom. Therefore, in line
with the run analyses, we might get a little up day tomorrow and a big
downer on Wed as the signal is executed. If the signal comes, it once again
suggests that another 20-40 trading days need to pass before a meaningful
rally.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
the bullish case REQUIRES
that the stocks rise to/above the highs of 5/2-5/5. If you remember, the
16-20 day index executed a signal on 5/5, which was supposed to and did
stop the market for 9-10 trading days, which expired Friday. They are now
free to rise. If prices had fallen below the 16-20 day back prices during
this 10 day period, it would have been a marvelous buy signal. Came close,
but close is not good enough. Note the demoralizing activity on Thursday
and Friday to me was also seen by Yvan Auger using a different methodology.
IF we now get a 16-20 day signal by prices
falling below the 16-20 day back prices that would be bearish ( see probs
below ) . On userx, that would require a drop below 2.80 this week. However,
by the Tuesday after Memorial Day ( 6 days from now ) the back prices will
all be at the 5/2-5/5 highs, so that to avoid the bearish signal prices
must be at or above those back prices by Friday/Next Tuesday. Note that
the day after three day weekends are often very important and you should
be nervous then.
IF we fall below the 16-20 day prices
here are the odds. 75% of the time prices will continue to drop. 67% of
these drops are major, in the 20-30% area. 33% of these drops are "minor"
in the 3-10% area. Note that this was signal that stopped out my 1 day
long position back in March and led to my bearish stance since then. Although
many excellent traders here made some money on the long side in particular
stocks and short-term trades, mutual funds and broad gold composites fell
about 4% from 3/2 to 5/5, a "minor" drop from 3/2 to the following HIGH.
( that's how these drops are measured ) . The 25% of gainers were all samll,
in the 0-3% range. N=about 25 total over 26 years. If this signal occurs,
the risk/reward clearly says don't be long and consider going short despite
the current low prices.
Note that IF we do rise this week that
the 35-39, 218-222, and 439-443 indices will all give signals on the Wed
after Memorial Day! That will represent an all-important point, to be discussed
then.
Note that the index is not predicting
one way or the other, but the run analyses are still bearish and the bulls
definitively need a rise this week. You can tell that my personal opinion
( worthless ) leans towards the bearish side and my Fidelity account to
short Fsagx is now open for business. Waiting...
Best of luck to all, this is a wonderful
site and we should support Kitco. When the time is right I fully plan to
buy my physical from Bart!
Lastly, SHAREFIN's marvelous gold sentiment
chart shows the recent bounce in sentiment off the important support line
and is now turning down to retest. IF the 16-20 index signal occurs the
prediction is that sentiment would break thru to the downside.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Crystal Ball: Glad
to see that you're following the userx predictor dog. Try recording the
prices each day and computing the 16-20 day index. Current prices are almost
about to fall under the back 16-20, but now that won't be a buy because
the fall must be within a half cycle, within at least 10 days from the
time of the last signal. If/when they fall thru, userx will be portending
a continuing decline.
And today, someone sold all those mining
shares off at the close such that an apparent up day turned into a down
day - another bummer. As per USERX being down. So we don't have a 1 down
2 up run into Monday, just a meaningless 1 up 1 down run. Just a little
more down and she's thru to the downside not to return to these levels
for a long time. Looks like that's what's about to happen. Yesterday and
today have been perfect to negate the opportunity for the index to become
bullish, just can't do it any better. When I need a down day it goes up
and when I need an up day it closes down. Very very important, even though
the moves are tiny. I've been bearish for a long time now, became uncertain
again, and it's just about bearish confirmation time again, clearly in
agreement with APH and EB. Close to being back to the "into the abyss",
"down to new all-time lows scenario", also thereby implying a continuing
dollar rise. If one's long here, clearly need to use the lows from 5/1
as a stop. Sorry to be bearish, but if anyone can take it, I will post
at some time the index's long-term ( year to two out ) prediction for the
final bottom and the subsequent once in a generation price explosion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Okay, who bought that
100 shares of Mongolian mining company KILLSKI and made userx and my composite
go UP today. If you've been following this analysis the last two weeks,
this tiny up close prevents the index from falling below the 16-20 day
prices within the required time period ( tomorrow ) . This leaves my system
out in the cold, meaning that we can now go back up to xau 63 without a
signal from my system. If you're long, gold stocks MUST rally before Tuesday
in a week from now ( 5/30; that Monday being Memorial Day ) because that
will be 16-20 days from the 5/2 runup. In other words, prices falling below
the 16-20 day index now would NOT be a buy signal and would portend continuing
decline. Similarly, a drop below the prior lows ( from 5/1 ) in the next
few days would give this now bearish index signal. So, the run analysis
has yet to turn bullish, but I won't be at all surprised if we've had our
retracement from the move up on 5/2 and we'll either go up and retest/exceed
those highs or we'll just drift, drift, drift lower ( as APH stated on
about 5/3, stating that the move up was bad allowing for a continuing drifting
down ) . Wish I was surer, and so I have to wait again. I am bummed out.
I will not be surprised by a move up within the next few days but the odds
remain at only 67% for going up. The system can't always predict.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Gold stocks will be
a buy within the next three days. Stocks fell the predicted 3+% today giving
a -1. The earliest the index will give a buy for is to be executed on Monday,
but this is the last possible day. So any spike down over 6% in a day on
Thursday or Friday will be a buy. The index and the day of the low form
a fairly normal distribution with a mean on the day of the index signal,
with a standard deviation of 1.5 days. You can be simple and certain by
just buying on the close of the day that the signal is executed or we can
try to beat the index by looking for the capitulation day ( more than 6%
down in a day ) . Any help will be appreciated. I will post long explanations
today, tomorrow, or Friday, detailing probabilities and stops. Be financially
and psychologically prepared. This will not be a true bull market, but
an excellent buy signal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
We're still on track
for the buy on a collapse, but it has not nearly dropped enough yet. Remember
that the drop below the 16-20 day prices must happen by Friday. Today,
prices will fall to somewhere right on the 16-20 back prices right where
they're "supposed" to be ( based on the 16-20 day index ) . Note, again,
how the market will push the stated time and price requirements almost
exactly to the limit. Remember the probably exagerated story about Gann
predicting a price at a certain time and in last 5 minutes it does it?
I've never seen that myself, but usually see the market wait until the
last possible day ( s ) to do what it's going to do.
Yesterday's little up day completed that
bearish 1 up 3 down run such that we are now on a 1 up 1 down run as of
the close today. If the index gives it's signal on Friday to be executed
on Monday ( the last acceptable time frame ) , maybe we'll be on a 1 up
4 down run at the close on Monday ( an acceptable run for a bottom when
combined with a signal ) . Gold is on a three down run today. Maybe it'll
continue to day five on Friday or even better, day 6 on Monday. If day
6 happens, remember that only twice in history have we gone down that 7th
day.
Again, most interestingly for others (
i've often seen this ) watch how the daily prices play with the 16-20 back
prices, let's say on userx. Today the back prices are 2.86, 2.87, 2.85,
2.85, and 2.84. The 2.86 drops out tomorrow and is replaced with a 2.81
( the all-time low is 2.80 that comes into play on ... Monday ) . Yesterday's
close was 2.95, so it can drop about 3% and not generate a -5 ( thereby
forestalling the buy signal another day ) .
I clearly do not recommend long positions
yet. The runs are bearish and one can continue to hold or initiate very
short-term ( a day or two or three ) shorts. I'll be happy enough if we
continue the fall to finally have the wait end. The real question for me
is "How many of us will have the guts to catch the falling knife on Friday
or Monday?" It's required to be extremely difficult, for me too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
also forgot to put
in another beaarish factor for this week, very short-term, but I think
it's useful knowledge for traders. Gold rarely has lengthy runs up or down
for several days. Mostly it's 1, 2 or 3 days in the direction on a closing
basis. Therefore, if you're bullish, you don't want SPOT gold to close
up 10 cents and if you're bearish you don't want gold to close down a little.
This is a generally accurate statement. We closed up a dime on Friday -
slightly bearish especially with the gold stocks down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
I've been waiting
for ten weeks now for some kind of capitulation low in the gold stocks
and the time is running out: it either happens by the end of this week
or it's not going to happen ( and it now cannot be a capitulation that
yields a bull market, but can yield quite a big rise ) . As posted last
Sunday, the 16-20 day index signal executed 5/5 usually stops the market
from going up for one-half cycle or 9-10 days, ending this week. A fall
below the 16-20 day prices ( they're still falling too ) will be a buy
only if it happens within that time period.
Bullish factors:
1. My gold composite closed Friday exactly
on the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement from the 5/1 low to the subsequent high.
Stocks going up now?
2. As posted on 5/1, the cycles were due
to bottom on 5/1 and may be seen as having bottomed, so we should go at
least sideways to up. That 5/1 post stated that I was expecting a 2-5 day
weak rally. The 2-5 day rally part was right and the "weak" was dead wrong.
3. The 5/5 signal is followed by sideways
to up prices 67% of the time and marks a high only 33% of the time. So
these odds are 2:1 that we're not going down much this week.
4. Hourly and weekly stochastics are oversold.
Bearish factors:
1. The run analysis remains bearish from
before 5/1 and again on the 1 up 3 down formation last week. We are now
1 up and 2 down so that a down day of any size on Monday will give us another
bearish run pattern. If the run continues down to down 5 days or more with
prices falling below the 16-20 day index, it'll be a classic buy pattern.
2. The xau daily stochastics are still
overbought.
3. As stated on 5/2, that 5/1 "low" was
very very strange. The gold stocks just doesn't jump 11% the first day
off a low ( the second day and thereafter, yes ) . Fake out?
4. Although sentiment numbers show low
bullish consensus ( meaning the numbers are bullish ) , once again I find
almost unanimous of letter writers and "experts" that I read are bullish
and already long ( auger though expects lower prices this week down to
xau of 56. They have stops at xau 57 down to 54.24. Breaking 58.20 on the
downside would also be likely to hit sell stops.
5. The BOE auction is in 7 trading days.
How could this fit with a capitulation low that must come before that?
It fits the back 16-20 day prices perfectly. IF a sell-off happens, the
index will take at least 2 days of -5s to yield a signal executed the third
day. If the index were at all +5s now, it would take 3 days plus a day
to execute. But the index has broken and as of Friday is not at +100. If
you look at the math, if the index has a +5,+5,+3,+5,+5=+92, two consecutive
-5s will generate a signal: First day, +5,+3,+5,+5,-5= ( 13x4 ) =+52 and
the next day, +3,+5,+5,-5,-5= ( 3x4 ) =+12. Adding in velocity, [+12- (
+52 ) ]/2=-20, and +12+ ( -20 ) =-8 and the sign has changed. It will therefore
take at least three days to execute a buy. Monday is likely to yield a
small move in anticipation of the Fed on Tuesday, so a -5 is unlikely.
If we fall to -5 on Tuesday, the index will execute a buy on Thursday,
on the Full Moon ( a confirmation ) . When prices rise back above the 16-20
prices, that usually ends the trade. The back prices continue to stay low
thru the following Tuesday, meaning that even if we get the buy signal,
prices are not supposed to rise much until after Tuesday otherwise the
index would give an almost immediate sell signal within three days from
the buy signal ( that just doesn't happen ) .
So the TA for me is divided and still not
clear. If we tank by the end of the week, the TA will be clear. If we just
drift lower and fall below the 16-20 day prices AFTER this week, the index
signal cannot be executed ( it's not a buy, it's past the half cycle buy
time ) and strongly predicts a very bearish, slowly falling scenario for
months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Gold stocks dropping
for day 2 down, run will be 1 up and 2 down now. IF IF we're going to get
the moderate capitulation ( it won't be a bull market buy signal bottom
because we'd have to be 2 up, then drop 25% in 10 days ) , index buy late
next week the stocks should drop every day averaging at least 2% a day,
probably taking out all stops all the downside ( so the run into the low
would be 1 up and 6 or 7 down--excellent ) . Most likely day would be a
buy next Thursday or Friday ( the full moon is correlated with highs and
lows but the index doesn't know that, it'll just give the buy after the
stocks have fallen below the 16-20 day prices ) . Today's index number
will probably be a +3, with the total moving lower from yesterday's +90
to +72.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The high 16-20 day
back price on userx today was 2.96. That was supposed to be support, allowing
for a 2% down move today. Not unexpectedly, and per posts from two days,
userx closed today at ... exactly 2.96 ( down 2% ) . That would give the
16-20 index a +4 for today ( a tie with one price and staying above the
other 4 back prices ) . It'll be interesting to see if current prices continue
to follow the back prices down staying above them, fall thru them to give
a fast buy signal next week, or just start rising in a few days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
85% prob short-term
gold stock shorting trade will be given if gold stocks close down today
based on the 1 up, 3 down run. If they close down today , the 3 down run
will not have been followed by a 3 up run to negate it. Have to be sure,
however, that they are closing down today ( can always reverse intraday
) . 16-20 back prices ( support ) today at down 2%.
As previously posted, if gold stocks fall
by next Friday to under the 16-20 prices ( the 16-20 day index turns from
+ to - ) , that will be a buy signal, no matter how far they fall. Am not
predicting this will happen, but if it does, I'll be a buyer for the first
time in months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Let's use USERX for
our data, publicly available unlike my proprietary gold composite, good
correlate. Look back 16-20 days as of today, 5/5/00. Five back prices are
3.05, 2.99, 3.01, 2.94, and 2.91. Markets, as a powerful rule, will draw
out their real directional move as LONG AS POSSIBLE, driving all participants
crazy ( and those that know the index even crazier! ) . I don't know the
next direction so the market will keep it unclear. I could and did verbally
predict to my co-developer that today's closing price would be 3.06, right
( exactly ) above the back prices, yielding a +5. For those checking, learning
computations, the sum of the five days X4 is -5, +5, -3, +5, and today
+5, yielding +28 with ( [+28]-[-12] ) /2= a total score of +40. Note how
despite today's decline, the index became more positive. Bingo, staying
right above the back prices, but this doesn't tell me anything predictive
( that's why it was expected and usual ) .
Look ahead. Monday's set of back prices
is 2.99, 3.01, 2.94, 2.91, and 2.89. They are dropping and will continue
to drop. Even if we fell below all 5 of these prices and got a -5 for Monday,
that -5 would only replace a -5 in Monday's five day computation and the
total would be unchanged from today. If in fact we get a major fall here,
the index delays changing from positive to negative due to declining back
prices and replacing -5 counts with other -5 counts! I am not predicting
this, but if we start to plunge you'll see the index delay a change from
+ to - until we start to fall thru the old lows.
I imagine that this is difficult to understand,
but it will be easier as the days progress and the computations become
easy to understand. Historically, I've seen plenty of fake-out lows where
we spike up immediately only to fall to a lower low that causes extraordinary
bearish ness. This is possible here. I'm not saying it's going to happen
but the odds are 33% for a 10-20% fast drop here. That will cause a buy
signal. ( If you check past posts when people asked what would turn the
index bullish, one response was a rise above 16-20 prices followed by an
immediate fall below them, ala summer 1999 ) . If a fall occurs that is
slow ( ala APH ) there will be no valid buy signal. The next signal if
we fall thru the 16-20 day prices must occur within 10 days from today
( Friday ) for it to be valid.
Again, I am not predicting this, as the
odds favor a sideways to upwards movement here. But a down day on Monday
will simply cause a -5 to be replaced and will certainly not give a buy.
If we do start down it will take at least another 4 or 5 days to generate
a great buy. The index only makes a prediction here after the next price
move ( up a lot will short, down a lot will buy ) . You can check back
Userx 35-39 days for the next upside target if we break thru this resistance,
up about 7% from today. I wait impatiently.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The 16-20 day signal
occurs for tomorrow. The computation for today was [-5] ( from 4/28 ) +
[-5] ( from 5/1 ) + [+5] ( from 5/2 ) + [-3] ( from 5/3 ) + [+5] ( from
today ) = -3 X 4 = -12. ( Still negative, but then add in velocity ) Change
from yesterday to today [ ( -12 ) - ( -52 ) ]/2= +20, such that -12+20=+8.
The sign has changed from - to + as of today, such that at tomorrow's close
I circle the composite's closing price and record "16-20 day contrary sell".
This again, is the trading index, such that most of the time one can sell
on the contrary sell ( as prices cross above the 16-20 day back prices,
like tomorrow ) and buy on the contrary buy ( as prices fall below the
16-20 day back prices. The last siganl was a contrary buy on 3/2, which
was normally a buy but the procedure XXed it out ( more on that another
time ) saying that the contrary buy should not be a good buy, with 67%
of the time prices falling thru it and 33% of the time prices staying flat.
In hindsight what happened was that prices stayed flat for about 3 weeks
and then fell for about 6 weeks, but now have shot up in the last 3 days.
The closing price tomorrow for most broad gold stock composites ( e.g.,
mutual funds ) will probably be at or a little below that price on 3/2,
as the index was forecasting. But the whole correct forecast for 2 months
failed to yield any profit since prices ended up essentially flat. Individual
variations in stocks occurred, as usual, with North Americans being higher
now and South Africans and Australians being lower, so I use my composite,
but most mutual funds are approximates.
So, what does the signal portend? By itself,
the index signal gives the probability that 67% of the time we will eventually
go higher and 33% of the time lower ( tomorrow would be a high ) , because
we are still in oversold territory ( prices are lower than the 35-39 and
92-96 day indices ) . If prices were giving this signal and we were above
the other two indices, tomorrow would be a definitive selling day. If prices
plunge after tomorrow, falling below the 16-20 day prices ( note that they
would have to rapidly fall to new lows, which is the way the index works
) that would be a super buy, but most of the time ( 67% ) prices get stopped
by the signal for a while ( usually a week or two ) and then continue up
to the next level, the 35-39 day back prices which are currently about
6% higher. Or by the close tomorrow we could be 6% higher and the 35-39
day index would start to break ( often you'll see the 16-20 and 35-39 dau
signals come exactly together or close together. The sell signal executed
on 2/10 ( perfect ) was a 16-20 contrary sell AND a 35-39 buy that was
XXed out. We'll see, but the bottom line is that the odds are the trend
is now up, which isn't any big deal of a forecast! All the cycles appear
to have bottomed on 5/1/00, which I also mark down and then will look ahead
about 18-20, 35-36, and 95-96 days from 5/1 for important cycle points.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
My gold stock composite
had a bad day, down about 4%, yielding a -3 today ( meaning the current
price was below 4 of the 5 16-20 back prices and above only 1 ) . Therefore,
I've got [-5]+[-5]+[-5]+[+5]+[-3]=-13x4= -52. Yesterday's sum was -80,
the difference from today to yesterday [-52- ( -80 ) ] was +28, divided
by 2 = +14 for a final composite of -38.
This shows that the index is still breaking
towards the signal ( a change from - to + ) that the bullish case definitively
needs, but the resistance encountered today was strong ( a strong Cabal?
) to move it from +5 back to -3. The jury is still out and the bullish
camp needs a move up tomorrow to generate the signal tomorrow for Friday.
I took a 1.5% loss on my half position this mid morning and I don't know
whether I did the right thing or the wrong thing, but the index has not
yet given the signal to end the existing downtrend. Needs to go up about
2% tomorrow to generate the signal for Friday. There is still a bull/bear
struggle right here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Our discussion and
Schippi's graph from 2 nights ago solved a MAJOR theoretical problem of
my system's. Whenever I get that special run ( 2 up, long run down ) to
mark the exact day of a multi-year low, prices are supposed to rise until
I get the same run to mark the exact top of the multi-year. The 1998 low
had never been reversed, BUT Schippi's graph showed that we got a 2 up
5 big down ( up on 10/6 and 10/7/98, then down big for five days ) , marking
the multi-year high! I had had 10/6 as a .001% down day. One price of one
gold composite stock was incorrectly reported to the world. When corrected
it changed 10/6 to an up day! Note that the central banks reportedly intervened
to drive gold down on 10/8, when the gold stocks opened strongly up and
then barely closed down on the stated intervention ( I didn't record what
the intervention was, it might have been to support the dollar ) . If this
is called manipulation, it's legal and perfect and destroyed the gold stocks/gold
market psychologically for years. This solves my technical problem for
the gold market and makes my system clearly super bearish until my next
capitulation run down. If you'd like to see my special pattern mark another
all-time high check out USERX on ..... 2/2/96 ( as a way of thanking you
for helping me find the above error ) .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
I haven't closed out
the shorts yet and may be sorry for not doing so, but this drop this morning
is the only way for the market to keep me. The stop is supposed to be a
"rise over the 16-20 day back prices". I've described the computations
before in theory, this is the first example since then of the index approaching
a signal. If this becomes bothersome please let me know and I will stop
the description over the next few days.
On Monday the current price was below
the price from 20, 19, 18, 17 and 16 days ago, yielding a -5. The same
was true for the prior Friday, Thursday, Wed, and Tues. The sum of those
five days was -25, which is multiplied by 4 to yield the ski index value
of -100 on Monday. Yesterday, Tuesday, the current composite price incredibly
closed above all of the prices of 16-20 days ago ( by about 2%, but the
amount means nothing ) , so the index got a +5 for yesterday. So I had
-5 ( from last Wed ) , -5 ( from Thurs ) , -5 ( from Fri ) , -5 ( from
Mon ) , and +5 from yesterday. This equaled -15 X 4 = -60. The velocity
of the change from Monday to Tuesday was [-60 - ( -100 ) ]/2 = +20, which
is added to the -60 to yield a 16-20 index value to -40. When the index
value changes from negative to positive here, a signal is generated for
the close of the next trading day. Hence my statements that it takes "several
days to generate a signal". Note that it actually takes a minimum of three
days plus the execution day ( 4 days total ) , meaning that the earliest
that a 16-20 signal can be executed currently is this Friday.
Usually when the index breaks, it will
end up generating a signal. But the times that the signal is avoided are
amazing to behold. Today, the back prices ( which are now falling ) are
between 3-4 % below yesterday's closing price. A fall today of more than
4% will produce a -5, but most likely today's price will fall to something
yielding a +3 or a -1, essentially keeping the entire process in suspense
and maybe even extending the signal generation day to next week or avoiding
the signal entirely. Note the potential convergence of these critical values
with WileE's statments about the need to stay above a certain level thru
Friday. The question for me is, do I have the guts to stay short for a
few more days waiting to see if the signal is generated now that I am back
to a small profit today. Can and should I follow the system exactly or
just say "get out while you have the chance and if the prices collapse,
so what, you've just missed a profit opportunity?" I knew that I did the
right thing by not capitulating yesterday at the close and I didn't because
my procedure clearly required me to at least compute yesterday's closing
prices to see if they surpassed the back 16-20 day prices. I posted, emotionally,
"Stopped Out" last night because it would be safest for shorters to just
get the heck out by the close of trading today. Think I'll follow my "chicken
strategy" and go from 95% short to 50% short right away and that way I'll
be happy whichever way the market goes over the next few days. I'm experienced
at the "chicken strategy", it always makes me control my emotions by taking
money off the table when things are uncertain for me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Just read your posts/chart
now. Your fund had the perfect 2 up, 7 down into the 8/31 low also for
a major buy and then at your arrow had a 2 down, 5 up. What exact date
is that possible 2 down, 5 up. It looks right ( strong enough ) and may
cause me to now have to track your fund as well as my own composite and
USERX. A 2 down, 5 up or more there would have given me a major shorting
signal because the prices were above the 16-20, 35-39, and 92-96 day prices!
Would have shorted on the first down day after the five up. My index gave
a sell near there and then gave the terrible triple sell that I've mentioned
in the past portending several years down and a drop of about 80% from
that exact high.
No, that was my Arrow on my mouse! Too
tired. But see the 2 UP and 5 DOWN at the EXACT HIGH, which would have
been a multi-year sell signal for me ( perfect ) and a short-term buy signal
that doesn't look just right because it went a little lower before rising
for a sell at a profit. If possible, post the exact date of the 2 up or
the five down and I'll check it out tomorrow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Just checked back
in. You are interpreting the "runs analysis" exactly correctly. There are
plenty of intermediate term bottoms that are NOT marked by the special
run that I have found. I cannot know when it will occur, but when it does
it has been highly predictive. Are you familiar with Mark Leibowitz's work
on volume reversal and stocks. He looked for a pattern that marked highs
and lows and says he's found it, but never really disclosed it to anyone.
I am disclosing it, but it only shows on a very broad composite of stocks.
It'll usually show on USERX. I made the same statement about 5 big down
in the stock market having marked lows in the past. So the absence of the
pattern does not mean a meaningful low can't occur, the presence means
it should occur. The bull markets of the 74 ( or was it 76 ) , 82, and
93 all started with that run. 98 low also but only 7 down. The major highs
in history were marked by 2 up and 5 or more down ( 1980, 1985, 1996 )
. The pattern has been incredible to the exact day in the past. It has
held up since it was discovered by us in 1985. The only strange thing so
far was that the Fall 1999 exact high was marked by only 2 up and 4 down
( although the index went short, not the run analysis ) . I had been expecting
a 2 up 5 or more run down off this cycle's high, which lead me to believe
that we would still be in a trading range thru this year until the run
off the top, marking the multiyear top occurred. It didn't and now the
world wide gold stocks are at all-time lows. Perhaps we're about to get
the run down again to a major bottom. I'm not so much worried about missing
a rise, I'm worried that when I buy that it'll go up or when I short that
it'll go down. They'll be plenty of times that I'll be out, unsure. Bobbo,
again, you appear to understand perfectly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
I'm sorry if I haven't
explained properly. I'm just so used to it that I think I'm explaining
clearly. Sure, it's over time. Just days. Today we went up. That's day
one up. If we go up tomorrow, that's day 2 up. If next day is down, we're
2 up and 1 down. If the down run continues to 5 or more AND averages 2%
per day on the down run, the special pattern has occurred. Less than 2%
down per day and the downtrend always has continued. Interestingly, the
reverse, 2 down and 5 or morre big days up is another very predictive run
marking other highs and lows, which I would describe when it occurs in
the future. But the best that I've got is the one I've been describing.
Is this clearer?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
I guess that I'm ashamed
to say that I still record each day's price on my big notepad and on my
1985 486 computer that I can copy files onto an old type floppy disc. But
as an example go to 8/18/98 closing price on USERX ( 3.48; day 6096 in
my database ) . Next day, 8/19, is up to 3.54 ( Day one up ) . Next day,
8/20, is up to 3.57 ( Day 2 up ) . The next seven days are down to 2.94.
The first day up, 9/1, I bought. The 2 up, run down sequence had been completed
for a meaningful ( big, tradeworthy bottom ) . I gave the day number in
my database, because for many many years I did not record the calendar
day, just my day number, starting from the first day that data was available
( each day representing a day that U.S. stock markets were open ) . Day
546, in late Sept 76 was the bottom at 2 up and 9 down. You can check out
the 1982 bottom too, 2 up and 10 down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
The run ends when
the first day that the price changes direction. We just completed a 1 up,
4 down run in my gold stocks because today was up. So now we've started
a 4 down, up run that's currently at 4 down, 1 up. If we go up tomorrow,
it'll be 4 down, 2 up. If the next day we go down, we'll have completed
a 4 down, 2 up run and have started a 2 up, N down run. I know the past
probabilities of every type of run MODERATED by my 16-20, 35-39, 92-96
day index signals. For example, a 2 up, 7 down run while all indeices are
on buys is a definitive ( 100% ) high probability, whereas when they're
all on sell signals, it's a definitive low. I developed the probs in 1985
and, contrary to my expectations, they have almost perfectly maintained
those probabilities over these past 15 years. So I really believe. Look
back in my posts to 2/22/00. Note the posted run of 1 down and 2 up made
me say--go short. It's almost perfect under the index signals I had then.
( note I was too chicken and said, short on next up day, which never happened
as they just fell day after day--I'm just supposed to short immediately
on that pattern ) . There are many many patterns, which I report the probs
on as each run occurs. The completed 1 up and 4 down run we just had has
actually never marked a bottom under all index sell signals ( where we
are now ) . So I stay short and it is highly, highly likely that we will
go to at least some lower low than yesterday's closing price.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Yup, they are total
capitulation sequences, apparently. The larger the drop, the bigger and
longer the rise. Take em to the bank trades. Average about one per year,
this year's failed for the first time ever when I got stopped out. Spelled
bad news, more down prices, IMO.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
DO you mean after
a 2 UP, 5 DOWN run? One rule is 5 or more straight days up after the five
down is a sell. Search back to the period of 3/29 to 4/5/2000. You'll see
me talking about a 2 up, 6 down run that failed to meet the 2% criteria
and that a great short should be when/if 4, 5, or 6 straight up days followed.
When the fifth day up followed, I went short. But I have many rules. For
example, sometimes we get 2 up and 5 down followed by 1 up and a spike
down day! THat's an intermediate term bottom and the longs are held until
I get ski index ( not run analysis ) signals that, for example, prices
have risen past the 92-96 day back prices. So it's not simple, human behavior
is complex, and the markets are highly complex. One could just take the
10% profit each time and be happy. 2 up and a longer run down predicts,
in the past, higher rises. I don't think that this post is being too helpful
to you because there is no one simple rule beyond the times that an immediate
run up follows.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Today will be day
four down, two up four down. You remember how nice a buy a two up and 5
or more run down usually is? Need one more day down, tomorrow BUT BUT THIS
WILL ONLY BE A BUY SIGNAL IF GOLD STOCKS FALL 10% from the start of the
run down. As of Friday, only down 3%. We need a drop of 7% combined today
and tomorrow. Not looking like it's dropping enough yet. If it goes down
slowly, it'll just keep going down. I've seen runs of 2 up and 12 down
that were meaningless because they averaged only 1% a day.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27e4/f27e4703aa9aa35af729a317bf462237d5a2292d" alt=""
Compare the current
day closing price to each of the past days ( e.g., the one 39 days ago,
38 days ago etc. ) . If today is higher than 39 days ago, give a +1, higher
than 38 days ago give another +1, lower than 37 days ago give a -1, tied
with 36 days ago give a 0, higher than 35 days ago give a plus 1. Add them
together and multiply by 4. Do this for today and each of the past four
days ( comparing yesterday's closing price to the 35-39 todays' from YESTERDAY,
two days ago to 35-39 days from 2 days ago, etc ) . Add together all five
days of numbers yielding a maximum of +100 or minimum of -100. Do this
every day. Next add the velocity component. Compare ( subtract ) the above
number from yesterday ( ranging from +100 to -100 ) to today's above number.
Divide by 2. Add it ( it may be + or -, don't use the absolute value )
to the original # which ranged from 100 to -100 ) . When this final conclusion
changes from + to - OR from - to + it yields a signal for the next day.
Zero does NOT yield a signal. So this number is not a moving average and
changes daily. We tried using combos of 2 to 2000 days and found 5 to work
( note it's a trading week! ) . This is not enough to know, because then
we have to get into theories of patterns of signals from the 16-20, 35-39,
92-96, and the longer-term set of 218-222, 439-443, and 660-662. The 16-20
is a contrary index most of the time. When it goes from + to - it's a buy
and will correspond to oversold, - to + is a sell. Same with the 660-664
( the long-term 3 indices turned out to be inversions of the shorter ones,
in that 92-96 is a bull and 218-22 is a bull! ) . My system is proprietary,
I will teach it to my kids and eventually write a book ( I'm an academic
clinical psychologist like Bernstein was and Prechter was ) . What I've
given you here is the basics, does not include all the great run analyses
( though I have given you down 1 and up 2 to sell, and up 2 down 5 or more
to buy ) and is not enough for you to use it. But I'm happy to gradually
give it away as we progress over the next few years if someone or all of
my gold bug friends will begin to calculate the above on a daily basis.
And follow along. You'll be amazed at how close you get to signals and
then just miss them or just get them. It'll make all the difference in
the world. Right now we're on all sell signals and I got stopped out 3
weeks ago by a 16-20 index changing from = to - ( which is usually a buy
and might still be this time but a crappy one ) because we then discovered
how to avoid the bad 16-20 contrary buys by what we call XXing them out.
The xxing out is right 67% of the time but must be used to avoid all large
losses. It gets a little more complicated.