Past accidents. Risk of more,
and terrorism.(over 360 accidents at:
http://www.greenpeace.org/~comms/nukes/chernob/rep02.html
)
Many more reactors would
be needed. Tons of radioactive materials would be transported through populated
areas: Dean Edwin Abrahamson The Challenge of Global Warming,
http://www.islandpress.org/books/bookdata/chlglbw.html
p. 27 says:
"The nuclear weapons proliferation
risk which would accompany the replacement of fossil fuel with nuclear
fission is staggering ..[That] would require between 7,000 and 8,000 large
nuclear power plants, each of which [if breeders] would produce about 1,000
kg. of plutonium annually. Between 7 and 98 million kg of plutonium would
therefore be produced per year and would be shipped hither and yon between
the various facilities which constitute the nuclear power fuel cycle. The
commercialization of plutonium would create major hazards because of its
incredible toxicity and its potential use in weapons. A typical shipment
would contain 250 kg - so there would be about 40,000 shipments annually.
About 10 kg. of plutonium is needed to construct an atomic bomb."
Nuclear is not directly suitable
for aircraft and vehicles, and adapting nuclear to make hydrogen or other
fuels would be a huge.
Nuclear fusion is still not
available, after 40 years' research and billions of dollars invested.
Magnetic Confinement Fusion
spending:
http://plasma.ep.wisc.edu/ufa/News/enews_021499.html
"On Feb. 1, the Department
of Energy released it's proposedbudget for FY 2000. Overall, DOE's budget
is proposed to go from $17.4 billion in FY 99 to $18.1 billion in FY 2000.
DOE's Office of Science (the
new home of the Fusion Energy Science program) is proposed to go from $2.698
billion in FY 1999 to $2.835 billion in FY 2000 - a $137 million increase.".
Fusion history: Extrapolating
from STARPOWER the claim that tokamak hot fusion has been ongoing since
1950 with never any beneficial surprises along the way and having spent
25 billion dollars worldwide. The laser inertial confinement fusion program
has been ongoing since 1970 with never any beneficial surprises along the
way and having spent 10 billion dollars worldwide. .
http://www.newphys.se/elektromagnum/physics/LudwigPlutonium/File135.html
Fusion prospects: Richard
E. Rowberg, Resources, Science, and industry Division April 6, 2000:
The National Council For
Science And The Environment cnie@cnie.org and http://www.cnie.org/nle
Brief for Congress:
"Successful development
of a fusion power plant, however, isproving to be one of the most difficult
scientific and technological challenges. Although progress has been steady,
it may be at least 35 to 50 years before an operating power plant is built."
Natural gas
Proportion of global energy
provided by gas: 20% of global energy supply (1997).
As a replacement for oil:
Gas itself will start running out from 2020 on. Demand for natural gas
in North America is already outstripping supply, especially as power utilities
take the remaining gas to generate electricity. Gas is not suited for existing
jet aircraft, ships, vehicles, and equipment for agriculture and other
products. Conversion consumes large amounts of energy as well as money.
Natural gas also does not provide the huge array of chemical by-products
that we are also dependent on.
Proportion of global energy
provided by gas IEO99, a 1999 report by the US Department of Energy and
the International Energy Agency. See: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo99/oil.html
as is not suited for existing
jet aircraft, ship, vehicles, and equipment for agriculture and other products.
"In late 1987 Toledo was
the first government entity in the State of Ohio (and one of the first
cities nationally) to implement a consortium use of transport natural gas
resulting in additional savings of $200,000 to $300,000 annually."
http://www.climate.org/programs/cities/sec2/Toledo.html
Gulf News Online, 29 May,
2000:
Economides: US gas price
spikes expected
"US natural gas prices "definitely"
will climb to $4/Mcf thisfall, with world oil prices escalating to $40/bbl
probably within a year, unless producers dramatically increase spending
to offset depletion and to supply growing demand, a University of Houston
professor told reporters at the Offshore Technology Conference Monday in
Houston.
But that's nothing compared
with what will happen when the real gas
Shortage hits North America
within 2 or 3 years, says Michael J. Economides, coauthor of "The Color
of Oil," a book about the economics of the oil and gas industry."
http://www.gulf-news.co.ae/16052000/BUSINESS/business16.htm
Canada: "Production per new
well in the western basin has slipped from a 1986 peak, and decline rates
are up. As a result, Canada will have excess pipeline capacity of about
1.5 to 2 billion cubic feet per day this year and will be "long" pipe until
2005, Mr. Frank predicts.
TransCanada faces "significant"
capacity turnback in 2002 and 2003, he says." (Brian Frank, vice president
BP Amoco Gas & Power Canada at The North American Gas Strategies Conference
Monday, April 17, 2000)
http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc
Colin Campbell, May 2000
in private email: "Problem with gas is that it has a different depletion
profile with a long plateau defined by market and pipeline. When the plateau
ends it ends abruptly. I think the US is now on the edge of this cliff."
"Gas will peak in 2020"
Colin Campbell, private email June 2000.
Brian Fleay, at http://www.hubbertpeak.com/gas/
"The two largest resources
not yet in production are in the Sahara and Niger Delta. It can be supposed
that gas pipelines will be built soon from the Middle East to Europe and
the Indian subcontinent, so that production will rise in steps as the linkages
are made. If one assumes a 1% increase over the next 5 years followed by
a 4% increase thereafter as oil becomes expensive, the midpoint of depletion
(more or less the gas "Hubbert Peak") would come around 2018 at about 120
Tcf/annum
Gas reserves are much more
difficult to assess than oil, and much more susceptible to economic factors,
the most important of which is transport (pipelines/LNG). The USA is more
depleted than anywhere else.
Any proposal to use natural
gas as the primary substitute for oil in the transportation sector represents
at best a temporary solution, and at worst a distraction of human industrial
resources (consuming time and capital, while oil and gas remain economic,
to produce a fleet which will then soon become obsolete, rather than using
the remaining economic reserves to create a lasting solution), as well
as a waste of natural resources of great potential value to future generations."
Brian J. Fleay: B Eng, M
Eng Sc, MIEAust, MAWWA, Associate of the Institute for Sustainability and
Technology Policy, Murdoch University, Western Australia, presenting paper
at the: Chartered Institute of Transport in Australia, National Symposium,
Launceston Tasmania 6-7 November 1998. Fleay is a retired civil engineer
who worked for over 30 years at the Water Authority of Western Australia.
He is currently an associate of Murdock University's Institute of Science
and Technology Policy and convenor of the Economic Policy Working Group
for the Greens WA.
Hydro-electric Present use:
2.3% of global energy supply (1997).
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo99/oil.html
As a replacement for oil:
Very small compared with 40% provided at present by oil.
Unsuitable for aircraft
and present 722 million existing vehicles.
http://www.iea.org/stats/files/selstats/cwtpese.htm
Electricity Not an Adequate
Substitute for oil.
It is important to note
that the end product of many alternative energy sources such as nuclear,
hydro-electric power, wind, solar, geothermal, and tides is electricity,
which is not a replacement for oil and natural gas in their important roles
as raw material for a host of products ranging from paints and plastics,
to medicines, and inks. But probably the most vital of all uses is to make
the chemicals which are the basis for modern agriculture. Electricity is
no substitute. Walter Youngquist, Consulting Geologist
http://www.ecotopia.com/apollo2/
The world vehicle fleet is
assessed at 722 million vehicles at 1st January 1999:
http://www.automotive-online.com/TRADE/executive_summary.htm
Coal
Current global use: 24% of
global energy supply.
As a replacement for oil:
Is 50% to 200% heavier than oil per energy unit. Bulky and dirty. Would
require a expansion of coal mining, leading to land ruin and increase in
greenhouse gas emissions. Hard to fine-control the rate of burn (oil/gas
is easy), therefore is used in power stations to make electricity, wasting
half of its energy content. A single station can produce a million tons
of solid waste each year.
Present coal-mining machinery
and transportation does not run on coal, but runs on oil-based fuels. Burning
coal in homes pollutes air with acrid smog containing acid gases and particles.
Large pollution & environmental
problems: (Smog, greenhouse gases, and acid rain). Wastes 1 unit of energy
to produce 8 units.
Liquid fuels from coal: Major
pollution, very inefficient, and huge amounts of water required.
Current global use: 24% of
global energy supply.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo99/oil.html
As a replacement for oil:
About 50% to 200% as heavier than oil per energy unit: Dr. Thomas Meyer
- Professor of Physics and Computer Science , California State University
http://www.csubak.edu/~tmeyer/sci360a/Notes5.htm
It has large pollution and
environmental problems, an EPR of less than eight, [consumes one unit of
energy to produce eight] and would require a massive expansion of coal
mining to replace oil leading to a dramatic increase in greenhouse gas
emissions.
"Conventional oil rapidly
displaced the direct use of coal as an industrial and transport fuel because
of its ease of storage and transport, the fine control possible in its
various uses and its high power-weight ratio. Oil is the most economically
effective of all the fuels, especially for transport.
Contemporary industries and
services using coal, gas and electricity require petroleum powered transport
to be economically effective and viable. The availability of cheap oil
is the most critical factor for the future of our contemporary world.
Not all fuel types are economically
equivalent. For the USA oil and gas produce 1.3 to 2.45 times the dollar
value in the economy than does the direct use of coal, with oil probably
superior to gas (Hall et al. 1986, p. 55). Coal converted to electricity
produces 2.6 to 14.3 times the dollar value in the US economy than does
the direct use of coal (Gever et al. 1991, p. 269). That is why we burn
coal in power stations to produce electricity even though half the heat
energy is wasted to the environment."
Large pollution & environmental
problems:
http://wwwistp.murdoch.edu.au/OilFleay/climaxingoil.html#4.2
Coal burning produces a
great deal of solid waste (5-20%) of original volume. A single coal-fired
electric plant can produce >1 million tons of solid waste a year. (100
X 100 x 100 m)
http://www.mines.utah.edu/~wmep/LE_136/Lectureout/LE13609.html
"Coal-fired generating stations
are major sources of the particulates and ozone that make up smog, acid
rain, greenhouse gases and persistent toxins such as mercury. The Ministry
of Environment has indicated that the current levels of particulates in
Ontario's air are associated with 1800 premature deaths and 1400 cardiac
and respiratory hospital admissions in Ontario each year." Dr. Sheela V.
Pasrur, Medical Officer of Health, City of Toronto
http://www.city.toronto.on.ca/legdocs/1999/agendas/committees/hl/hl990406/it002.htm
"Particulates penetrate deep
into lungs. Prolonged inhalationcauses a range of respiratory and cardiovascular
problems, such as emphysema, asthma, bronchitis, lung cancer, and heart
disease."
Seth Dunn, research associate
at the Worldwatch Institute.
http://www.wvhighlands.org/VoiceSep99/CoalPartI.WW.Sept99Voice.htm
"Coal-burning power plants
are a major source of carbon dioxide,a greenhouse gas, and are the leading
cause of acid rain. Coal-burning power plants have a Clean Air Act incentive
to clean up their act. Taxpayers should not be funding a $2.4 billion Clean
Coal program or additional coal research and development programs"
http://www.house.gov/science/aurilio_4-9.html
at House Science Subcommittee
On Energy And Environment, April 9, 1997
Liquid fuels from coal:
Steve Morningthunder Instituto
de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
http://208.240.253.224/page143.htm
Solar and wind
Global solar use: About 0.006%
of global energy supply. Energy varies constantly with weather or day/night.
Not storable or portable energy like oil or natural gas, so unsuited for
present vehicles and industry. Batteries bulky, expensive, wear out in
5-10 years. Photovoltaic solar equipment (US$4/watt) are about 15% efficient,
giving about 100 watts of the 1 kW per square metre exposed to bright sunshine
(enough for one light bulb). A typical solar water panel array can deliver
50% to 85% of a home's hot water though. Usingsome of our precious remaining
crude oil as fuel for manufacturing solar & wind equipment may be wise.
Global wind power use: 0.07%
of 1990 global energy supply. As with solar, energy varies greatly with
weather, and is not portable or storable like oil and gas. Each wind turbine
from Denmark produced of 698 kW averaged over a year.
"This surge in solar sales
comes as current data shows solar energy makes up less than one percent
of global power supplies. Presently, about 800 megawatts of solar power
capacity is in place globally, enough to meet yearly energy needs for 200,000
U.S. homes." WorldWatch Institute, July 1998
http://www.worldwatch.org/alerts/pr98716.html
"The new wind turbines added
in 1998 have pushed overall wind generating capacity worldwide to 9,600
megawatts at the end of this year--double the capacity in place three years
earlier
..These wind turbines will
generate roughly 21 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity in 1999--enough
for 3.5 million suburban homes. Wind power is now the world's fastest growing
energy source.."
ttp://www.worldwatch.org/alerts/pr98716.html
Total global energy use:
13.7 terrawatts in 1990 (terrawatt is a million megawatts.
Paul R.Ehrlich and Anne
H. Ehrlich
http://www.npg.org/forums/ehrlich.htm
Paul Ehrlich is Professor
of Population Studies, Stanford University, Anne Howland Ehrlich is a senior
research associate in biology and associate director of the Center for
Conservation Biology at Stanford.
Photovoltaic solar panels:
US$4 per watt, average wholesale price for solar module in 1995.
http://www.alfenterprises.com/SolarIndex.html
Solar water heaters: Florida
Solar Energy Centre:
http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/Solar/APPS/SDHW/EN5.HTM
Cumulative generating capacity
worldwide topped 10000 Megawatts (MW) in 1998.
Manufacturers installed more
than 2400 MW of wind-generating capacity worldwide last year and expect
to install another 2000 MW in 1999. Investment in wind generating capacity
exceeded US$3 billion in 1998 for the first time.
http://www.chelseagreen.com/Wind/articles/Overview.htm
Average size of wind turbine
in 1998 from Denmark Wind Turbine Manufacturers Association: 698 kW.
http://www.windpower.dk/stat/tab03.htm
Hydrogen Current global use:
US (only) 1998 consumption is 0.01% of global energy supply.
As a replacement for oil:
Hydrogen is currently manufactured from methane gas. It takes more energy
to create it than the hydrogen actually provides. It is therefore an energy
"carrier" not a source.
Liquid hydrogen occupies
four to eleven times the bulk of equivalent gasoline or diesel. Existing
vehicles and aircraft and existing distribution systems are not suited
to it. Solar hydrogen might be an option in hot countries.
Current global use: 23 billion
cu. ft a day in 1998.
http://buscom.com/editors/RC-219.html
Conversion calculator at
http://www.hionsolar.com/n-heq1.html (1 cu. ft = 0.0000466 barrel of crude
oil.)
As a replacement for oil:
Existing vehicles and aircraft and existing distribution systems are not
suited to it. "Hydrogen, while very abundant on earth, almost never exists
as a free gas, so other hydrogen compounds need to be treated in order
to make hydrogen gas. Currently the treatment of method with steam is used
to produce the hydrogen gas ( CH4 (g) + H2O = 3H2 (g) + CO (g) ) (Zumdahl,1997)
but this reaction requires a lot of energy to make the hydrogen gas . It
is currently more economical to simply burn the methane instead of using
it to get the hydrogen used for fuel. In addition, this method of achieving
hydrogen endorses a reliance upon natural gas as well as producing Carbon
Monoxide as a byproduct."
http://darwin.bio.uci.edu/~sustain/global/sensem/Forrest98.htm
Liquid hydrogen occupies
eleven times the space of equivalent gasoline or diesel:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/afvs/vehicles.html#500
David Pimentel states on
pg 212 of Food, Energy, and Society, revised edition "that the volume of
hydrogen fuel is about 4 times greater for the same energy content of gasoline
(8000 kcal/liter versus 2030 kcal/liter)." .
Other sources of energy
Options: Shale, tar sand,
coalbed methane, ethanol, biomass (from vegetation), etc.
Effectiveness as replacements
for oil: Huge investment in research and infrastructure to exploit them,
plus large amounts of now-expiring oil supply. 6% of US gas is from non-conventional
generation. The major problem is that they cannot be exploited before the
oil shocks cripple attempts to bring them on line, and the rate of extraction
is far too slow to meet the huge global energy demand.
Huge investment in research
and infrastructure to exploit them, plus large amounts of now-expiring
oil supply. 6% of US gas is from non-conventional generation. The major
problem is that they cannot be exploited before the oil shocks cripple
attempts to bring them on line, and the rate of extraction is far too slow
to meet the huge global energy demand.. Example, Canadian oil sands: "I
think the problem with extracting tar sands etc is not exactly economics.
It is just such a very slow process so it cannot deliver nearly enough
to compensate. Canada would be black with dump trucks."
Colin Campbell, June 2000
in private email.)
How it will affect us
Food production & delivery
depends on oil
Grain production: Food grains
now contain between 4 and 10 calories of fossil fuel for every 1 calorie
of solar energy.
Four percent of US energy
budget is used to grow food, while 10 to 13 percent is needed to put it
onto our plates. The worsening oil shortages will make production increasingly
expensive.
Putting food production
closer to city consumers will be vital.
Percentage of US grain used
to feed cattle: 70%Efficiency: Meat feeds 1/5 as many people as the grain
could.
Number of cats & dogs
in USA: 131 million
Food given to pets: The
North American pet food and supply industry is worth $30 billion annually,
and growing.
"Future food" being consumed
by using gasoline in vehicles:
Gasoline consumed `now'
will deprive future agriculture of energy for producing food. Here's how
much future food a 30 m.p.g vehicle is "eating" now
Bread, 1 kg loaf = 6 miles=
one slice per 422 yards
That gasoline = human heavy
farm labour for 23 hrs
Beef, 1 kg = consumed by
driving 76.2 miles
That gasoline = human heavy
farm labour 300 hrs
Canned corn 1 kg= consumed
by driving 5.4 miles
That gasoline = human heavy
farm labour 20 hrs
Oil for transportation
Automobiles, globally: 722
million (Jan 1, 99)
Automobiles, USA: 132 million
(1997)
Trucks (all types, in USA):
1.5 million
Buses: (all types, in USA):
654,000, in 1974.
Locomotives: (USA) 26,000
World aircraft fleet: 11,000
aircraft more than 100 passengers. All of these are designed for oil-based
fuel
World shipping: 85,000 ships
in world.
Decked fishing boats in
the world: 1.2 million
Globalization: Will end
because of fuel costs & scarcity.
Grain production: "Food grains
produced with modern, high-yield methods (including packaging and delivery)
now contain between four and ten calories of fossil fuel for every calorie
of solar energy. It has been estimated that about four percent of the nation's
energy budget is used to grow food, while about 10 to 13 percent is needed
to put it on our plates. In other words, a staggering total of 17 percent
of America's energy budget is consumed by agriculture! "
p. 172, BEYOND OIL, Gever
et al.; Univ. Pr. Colorado 1991.
Percentage of grain consumed
by cattle: 70% (U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service)
A given quantity of grain eaten directly will feed 5 times as many people
as it will if it is first fed to livestock and then is eaten indirectly
by humans in the form of livestock products (M.E. Ensminger, PH.D., internationally
recognized animal agriculture specialist)
http://www.mcspotlight.org/media/reports/beyond.html#5
"If the fertilizers, partial
irrigation [in part provided by oil energy], and pesticides were withdrawn,
corn yields, for example, would drop from 130 bushels per acre to about
30 bushels.":
http://dieoff.com/page185.htm
Note, that drastic drop
would only affect a minority of US agriculture: http://dieoff.org/page40.htm
states:" In the United States,
surface water supplies about 60% of the water used in irrigation, with
the remainder coming from ground water supplies."
Number of cats & dogs
in USA: 131 million
http://www.petfoodinstitute.org/facts_n_figures.html
Food given to pets: The North
American pet food and supply industry is worth $30 billion annually, and
growing..
http://canada.internet.com/can-news/article/0,1087,141_24611,00.html
Future food being consumed
by using gasoline in vehicles:
Number of miles a 30 m.p.g
vehicle drives to consume 1 kg of foods:
Bread, 1 Kg = 6 miles =
is one slice per 422 yards
Equivalent to human doing
heavy labour 1 hour
Beef, 1 Kg = consumed by
driving 76.2 miles
Equivalent to human doing
heavy labour 300 hrs
Canned corn = consumed by
driving 5.4 miles
Equivalent to human doing
heavy labour 20 hrs
Based on data of David Pimentel,
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Division of Nutritional Sciences,
Cornelll University, Ithaca, New York, USA, in his book "Food, Energy and
Society", page 13.
http://www.unu.edu/unupress/food/8F072e/8F072E06.htm
This data was calculated
by Steve Morningthunder (of Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México) as follows: 30 mpg =12.66 kms per liter
@ 1.6 km per mile. Human can work at rate of 0.075 kW
Automobile is 20% efficient
in converting gasoline heat energy into mechanical work..
Gals gasoline equivalent
per kg beef = 2.54, bread=0.20 gal/kg, canned corn=0.18 gal/kg
2.54 * 30mpg =76.2 miles
per kg beef, bread=6 miles/kg, canned corn=5.4 miles/kg
1000 g per kg / 76.2 = 13.12
g per mile beef, bread=166.7g/mile, canned corn=185.2g/mile
76.2 * 1.6 = 122 km per
kg beef, bread=9.6 km/kg, canned corn=8.64km/kg 1000 gms per kg/ 122 =
8.2 g per km beef, bread=104 g/km, canned corn=115 g/km 117.3 hours human
sweat labour per gallon/30 mph = 3.91/1.6=244 sweat hrs/km.
Human sweat hours/kg is
therefore 122 km/kg*244=298, bread=23 hrs, canned corn=20hrs
Oil for transportation
Automobiles, globally: "The
world vehicle fleet is assessed at 722 million vehicles at 1st January
1999":
http://www.automotive-online.com/TRADE/executive_summary.htm
Automobiles, USA: 132 million
in USA 1997:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/hs98/tables/mv1.pdf
Buses: Of the total bus population
of 654 ,000 vehicles in 1994, 71 percent were school buses, 24 percent
were transit buses, and 5 percent were intercity buses
http://www.ota.fhwa.dot.gov/hcas/final/two.htm
Trains: "Today the nation's
railroads employ 192,000 people who maintain and operate just under 200,000
miles of track. 26,000 locomotives pull 1.6 million freight and passenger
cars."
http://www.csrmf.org/history/
Trucks: (all types) in USA
1997, 77 million:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/hs98/tables/mv9.pdf
World aircraft fleet: "The
number of aircraft in the worlddesigned for scheduled and charter traffic,
with space for more than 100 passengers, currently totals some 11,000.":
http://www.ctt.se/company_overview/market/
World shipping: 85,000 ships
in the world.
http://www.lr.org/news/pr/9917.html
Between 1970 and '92, the
last year for which figures are available, the number of decked fishing
boats in the world doubled, from 581,000 to 1.2 million. http://spj.org/sdxawards96/08pubservice/tp1d02.htm
World War 2 Rationing described
at http://www.batavia.k12.il.us/bps/HistWeb/TXTIMG/96prjcts/ww2bat/reports/hmfront/rationin/hoke2.htm
"The number of aircraft in
the world designed for scheduled and charter traffic, with space for more
than 100 passengers, currently totals some 11,000. These can be divided
into two different groups, long-haul aircraft (wide-body) and short-haul
aircraft (narrow-body)."
http://www.ctt.se/company_overview/market/
Aircraft fuel capacity and
range figures. For a 777-300 the capacity is 45,220 gallons (US), the range
is 5,960 nautical miles, with up to 550passengers. Boeing web site for
the 777 is:
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/777-300/product.html
Oil for industry
Construction industry example:
Energy to build an energy-efficient
home is equivalent to 6,500 gallons of gasoline.
Number of by-products of
oil: Over 500,000 including fertilisers (they are the most vital), medicines,
lubricants, plastics (computers, phones, shower curtains, disposables,
toys, etc.), asphalt (roading and roofs), insulation, glues/paints/ caulking,
rubber tires and boots, carpets, synthetic fabrics/clothing, stockings,
insect repellent..
The total life cycle energy
of an Energy Efficient Home is 5,653 GJ (equal to 927 barrels of oil).
Raw material extraction & production & construction (pre-use) phase
energy is 905 GJ (16.0%), use phase energy is 4,714 GJ (83.4%) and end-of-life
phase energy is 34 GJ (0.6%). EEH life cycle energy consumption is 9,802
GJ less than the Standard Home, which is a reduction of 63% (or 1,598 barrels
of oil). Figure 3-7 graphically illustrates the percentage of pre-use,
use, and end-of-life phase energy in both SH and EEH.
http://www.umich.edu/~nppcpub/research/lcahome/homelca3.html
A GJ is a Gigajoule, and
is equivalent to 7.28 gallons of gasoline
(Conversions calculator
at http://www.hionsolar.com/n-heq1.html)
By-products of oil:
"It is important to note
that the end product of many alternative energy sources such as nuclear,
hydro-electric power, wind, solar, geothermal, and tides is electricity,
which is not a replacement for oil and natural gas in their important roles
as raw material for a host of products ranging from paints and plastics,
to medicines, and inks. But probably the most vital of all uses is to make
the chemicals which are the basis for modern agriculture.." Walter Youngquist,
Consulting Geologist http://www.ecotopia.com/apollo2/
Most people have no idea
of the tremendous number of common items produced from crude oil. Many
people associate gasoline or diesel fuel with crude oil, but not the huge
number of products that are used everyday. The items produced from crude
oil are astounding and number in the thousands. Scientists have identified
at least 500,000 different uses of oil."
Examples:
Saccharine, artificial sweetener)
roofing paper aspirin hair coloring heart valves crayons parachutes telephones
bras transparent ape antiseptics purses deodorant panty hose air conditioners
shower curtains shoes volleyballs electrician's tape floor wax lipstick
sweaters running shoes bubble gum car bodies tires house paint hairdryers
guitar strings pens ammonia eyeglasses contacts life jackets insect repellent
fertilizers hair coloring movie film ice chests loudspeakers basketballs
footballs combs/brushes linoleum fishing rods rubber boots water pipes
vitamin capsules motorcycle helmets fishing lures petroleum jelly lip balm
antihistamines golf balls dice insulation glycerin typewriter/computer
ribbons trash bags rubber cement cold cream umbrellas ink of all types
wax paper paint brushes hearing aids compact discs mops bandages artificial
turf cameras glue shoe polish caulking tape recorders stereos plywood adhesives
TV cabinets toilet seats car batteries candles refrigerator seals carpet
cortisone vaporizers solvents ail polish denture adhesives balloons boats
dresses shirts (no-cotton) perfumes toothpaste roller-skate wheels plastic
fork tennis rackets hair curlers plastic cups electric blankets oil filers
floor wax ping pong paddles cassette tapes dishwashing liquid water skis
upholstery chewing gum thermos bottles plastic chairs transparencies plastic
wrap rubber bands computers gasoline diesel fuel kerosene heating oil asphalt
motor oil jet fuel marine diesel butane " Dr. Gary L. Stringer Northeast
Louisiana University
http://etrc33.usl.edu/etrc/projects/osage/acs/made.html
Maguire Energy Institute
lists products made from oil, at:
http://www.cox.smu.edu/maguire/learningLCCh1.html
City drinking water, government
services.
Number of cities in the
world: over 55,000
Services to consider: Water
supply pumping, sewage disposal, garbage disposal, street/park maintenance,
hospitals & health systems, police, fire services.
National defense (land,
sea, air). Possibility of wars over remaining oil.
Number of cities in the world:
over 55,000
Weather forecasts are available
for each of them, at
http://cruises.about.com/travel/cruises/msub30.htm
Paper on effects of scarcity:
Economy and employment
International oil import
costs: Sharp rises (increasing global competition for dwindling oil available
from five Middle-Eastern countries and former Soviet Union.). International
tensions.
Military also obstructed
by oil shortages.
National debt, inflation:
Money goes out of country to oil producers.
Money becomes scarce. Interest/mortgage
rise up.
Government prints more money
to pay overseas energy bills. Money devalues. Prices rise.
Poverty: Public, and businesses
become poorer paying higher energy costs. Less spending, less sales. Layoffs.
Welfare payments, taxes: Taxes up. Pensions for aging/disabled population
reduced or discontinued.
"Each year the United States,
one of the world's largest producers of fossil fuels, imports an estimated
additional US $50 billion worth of oil to satisfy domestic demand for energy."
http://www.climate.org/programs/cities/sec3/Phoenix.html
Other serious quality-of-life
aspects
Heating and cooling In cold
regions oil heats buildings (burned as fuel in homes or in oil-fired electric
power stations. In hot areas oil power provides air conditioning. As natural
gas is substituted for oil, the gas price itself will rise.
Smog Energy price and shortages
will increase wood burning in homes
Wood and coal smoke increase
city smog.
"The cost of operating heating
and cooling equipment representsabout 60% of the total utility bill for
the typical Louisiana resident." Louisiana Department of Natural Resources:
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.leeric.lsu.edu/energy/hvac/+%22energy+demand%22+%22air+conditioning%22&hl=en&client=googlet
The EPA estimates that the
lifetime cancer risk from wood stove smoke is twelve times greater than
that from an equal volume of second hand tobacco smoke. (The Health Effects
of Wood Smoke, Washington State Department of Ecology); (b)"Burning two
cords of wood produces the same amount of mutagenic particles as: Driving
13 gasoline powered cars 10,000 miles each at 20 miles/gallon or driving
2 diesel powered cars 10,000 miles each @ 30 miles/gallon. These figures
indicate that the worst contribution that an individual is likely to make
to the mutagenicity of the air is using a wood stove for heating, follower
by driving a diesel car. (Dr. Joellen Lewtas, Contribution of Source Emissions
of the Mutagenicity of Ambient Urban Air Particles, U.S. EPA, #91-131.6,
1991) hhttp://www.webcom.com/~bi/fact-sheet.htm
"Coal-fired generating stations
are major sources of the particulates and ozone that make up smog, acid
rain, greenhouse gases and persistent toxins such as mercury. The Ministry
of Environment has indicated that the current levels of particulates in
Ontario's air are associated with 1800 premature deaths and 1400 cardiac
and respiratory hospital admissions in Ontario each year." Dr. Sheela V.
Basrur, Medical Officer of Health, City of Toronto
http://www.city.toronto.on.ca/legdocs/1999/agendas/committees/hl/hl990406/it002.htm
Why public warning is
so late
Secrecy to keep price of
oil company shares high Oil companies and oil producing countries depend
on shareholder confidence to get loans for exploration. It has been in
their interest to keep quiet about the exhaustion of the world's oil reserves.
False reporting of reserves
includes:
(a) There is clear evidence
that the seven major oil-extracting countries have for years reported unchanged
reserves (even though they were extracting and selling billions of barrels
of oil, and that the reserves would therefore be less each year).
(b) The industry has understated
actual discoveries to give the false impression of an increasing discovery
trend.
(c) In 1988 five of those
countries suddenly claimed they each had about twice as much reserve oil
as in 1987.
http://www.hubbertpeak.com/campbell/images/com12.gif
OPEC countries depends on
income from exports OPEC countries need to earn as much oil revenue as
possible to support rapidly growing populations where the public health
care, education and other services are traditionally provided free, from
oil revenues, rather than from taxes.
Secrecy to continue getting
loans for exploration
The Gulf states, Bahrain
and Saudi Arabia in particular, suffer from a combination of high expectations,
rapid population growth and falling oil revenues: a potentially-explosive
combination. In the 1970s, the rapid inflow of oil wealth led all the Gulf
states to create extensive welfare systems. Governments provided health
care, education, and other services for free to all citizens, and any citizen
with an advanced degree was entitled to a lucrative government job. Since
the early 1980s, however, the price of oil has fallen dramatically - with
disastrous results for the budgets of regional governments.
http://www.biu.ac.il/SOC/besa/meria/journal/1999/issue3/jv3n3a3.html
False reporting of reserves:
"The industry as systematically
understated the size of discovery(in past to meet strict SEC rules). [US
Securities and Exchange Commission]. It prefers to see the reserves be
revised upwards over time. It has misled analysts into thinking that more
is being found than is the case, which in turn exaggerates the trend into
the future.
Seventy countries in 1999
reported unchanged reserves to the Oil & Gas Journal despite production,
which is implausible. Some haven't changed their estimates for years."
private email from Colin Campbell, June 2000.
Publicity about false reporting
of reserves:
http://www.hubbertpeak.com/debate/resref.htm
View (below the graph) the
table of actual numbers from which this graph was made. The tables itself
is found at:
http://www.hubbertpeak.com/campbell/images/com12.gif
What you can do
Personal preparations: Reduce
energy dependence of family, home, lifestyle. The less fuels and goods
you consume, the less the impacts will be.
Workplace: Same.
Work on it with friends:
Workmates, neighbourhood, city, governments.
The ideal use for remaining
oil and mineral reserves is into industries that create inexhaustible alternative
energy equipment like windmills, solar water heaters, biomass (vegetation
that creates fuels), etc.
Share your feeling with others.
Try to stay positive and active rather than ignore the situation. Where
there's life there's hope, esp. if we collaborate and are creative.
"It's not that new". Humans
have always faced hardships, and many among us do so constantly now. Learn
from them.
Possible emergency measures
to consider:
-
Alert the entire public so people
will accept preparations for the oil shortages and will participate in
finding/implementing solutions
-
Relocate food production nearer
to cities
-
Relocate workplaces nearer to
homes or homes nearer to workplaces
-
Prepare for conserving and rationing
of dwindling oil/other resources that are created using oil
-
Population control to protect
children being born into the extremely harsh conditions that seem likely,
and to conserve resources for those already born.
-
General re-localize, to reverse
now-futile globalization
-
Strengthen the police to deal
with likely social chaos and to control distribution of vital supplies.
-
Alert the national leaders to
cooperate against this major threat that faces us all.
Note: "The USA has the exceptional
position as the largest and a growing importer. US imports deny somebody
else access to oil. For example, starving Africans result. Tax on gasoline
is lower in the USA is lower than in other countries by a large factor.
So the US could easily curb its excess. In fact it has no option. The worst
thing the US can do is press OPEC to increase production, which will simply
make the peak higher and the decline steeper. It is just digging itself
into a bigger hole, morality apart." ColinCampbell, in private email, June
2000.
More information
Documented evidence
All references and authorities
for this information are easily available in the "longer" version which
you can download by temporarily joining the RunningOnEmpty internet forum
mentioned below. It is in the Files section.
Web sites
The oil die-off is explained
in up-to-date detail at http://www.hubbertpeak.com
and http://www.dieoff.org
Both sites are keyword-searchable,
with scientific and oil industry literature about this topic. It is heavily
annotated with authoritative references.
Discussion forum - Technical/scientific:
http://www.egroups.com/group/energyresources
Discussion forum-Implications, action: http://www.egroups.com/group/RunningOnEmpty
Author of this sheet: Bruce Thomson (moderator of RunningOnEmpty forum at http://www.egroups.com/group/RunningOnEmpty) and helped by members of those groups.
COPY THIS ITEM FREELY TO OTHERS